In June, the Supreme Court docket dominated towards Trump’s order to limit birthright citizenship for some people born within the US.
Printed On 9 Jul 2026
US President Donald Trump says he plans to ask the US Supreme Court docket to rehear a latest case which struck down his order to end birthright citizenship for all people born within the US.
The courtroom final month rejected Trump’s try to limit birthright citizenship within the US, however talking on Wednesday, the president mentioned he’ll ask for the case to be heard once more.
Really useful Tales
listing of three objectsfinish of listing
“AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IS NOT FOR SALE! The truth is, that may be a crime, and due to this fact, the Supreme Court docket’s ruling is fallacious,” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Fact Social. “I will likely be asking for a Rehearing by the US Supreme Court docket, IMMEDIATELY.”
The 6-3 ruling towards Trump’s order represented a significant blow to the US chief and his efforts to remodel immigration coverage.
Upon taking workplace on January 20, 2025, Trump signed an government order looking for to bar these born within the US to oldsters on short-term authorized statuses or with out documentation from robotically receiving US citizenship.
Trump known as the newest ruling “too unhealthy for our nation” and appealed to Republicans in Congress to go laws constricting birthright citizenship. That can possible show to be an uphill battle, with public opinion polls recurrently exhibiting sturdy public assist for the observe and the Supreme Court docket’s majority opinion suggesting a constitutional modification can be required.
Trump’s possibilities of a brand new listening to seem low, with the Supreme Court docket not often granting requests to rehear circumstances. It has been many years for the reason that courtroom final allowed a retrial after issuing a ruling in an argued case.
Immigration overhaul
Since taking workplace, Trump has regarded to overtake almost all forms of immigration within the US.
The courtroom had beforehand handed the president a number of immigration victories in latest months, together with permitting him to successfully put off particular authorized standing for residents of some crisis-hit international locations, known as Momentary Protected Standing, and using a controversial tactic of bodily blocking asylum seekers from stepping on US soil, the place the federal government is legally obligated to permit them to use for cover.
However the Supreme Court docket voted towards his bid to limit birthright citizenship within the US, ruling that his directive violated language within the US Structure’s 14th Modification that confers citizenship to these born within the US who’re “topic to the jurisdiction thereof”.
Rights teams hailed the courtroom’s resolution. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) lawyer Cecillia Wang, who argued the problem on the Supreme Court docket, mentioned the choice “reaffirms a basic American promise – in case you are born right here, you’re a citizen”.
A Migration Coverage Institute-Penn State research launched in Could of final 12 months mentioned an estimated 255,000 infants a 12 months can be born within the US with out citizenship below the order, growing the undocumented inhabitants by 2.7 million by 2045.
It warned that the order “would create a self-perpetuating, multigenerational underclass – with US-born residents inheriting the social drawback borne by their dad and mom and even, over time, their grandparents and great-grandparents”.
