CRA’s ‘stupid mistake’ compels taxpayer to pay taxes on extra income

Article content material

I hardly ever get any bodily mail anymore. Actually, if it weren’t for my weekly New Yorker journal subscription, my mail provider would don’t have any motive to go to my entrance stoop. Over a decade in the past, I switched all my payments (hydro, pure gasoline, dwelling web, bank cards, and so forth.) to electronic mail supply, and this consists of most tax slips, in addition to correspondence from the Canada Revenue Agency.

Article content material

Article content material

Article content material

So, you may think about my horror after I arrived dwelling from work one darkish, chilly January night this winter to discover a solitary piece of mail: an outsized, brown envelope from the CRA. This was most uncommon, since I’ve been receiving all my notices of evaluation (and, sometimes, reassessment) through electronic mail notification, which requires me to log into the CRA’s My Account portal to view the discover. If the CRA was sending me outsized bodily mail, it was unlikely to be a novelty cheque. I suspected one thing was awry.

Positive sufficient, my 2023 tax return was caught by the CRA’s matching program, which decided that I had “acquired funding earnings that seems to have been not absolutely reported.” Uh oh.

The rationale for the big brown envelope was as a result of the CRA, together with its letter to me, had enclosed two legal-sized spreadsheet printouts containing summaries of all my 2023 T5 and T3 Slips reporting funding earnings. Apparently, I had omitted to incorporate some Canadian dividend earnings from a T5 slip from a secondary brokerage account I had.

Underneath the Income Tax Act, in the event you fail to report at the least $500 of earnings in a tax 12 months and in any of the three previous taxation years, you may be hit with a “repeated failure to report earnings” federal penalty. That is calculated because the lesser of 10 per cent of the unreported earnings and 50 per cent of the distinction between the understatement of tax (or the overstatement of tax credit) associated to the omission, and the quantity of any tax paid in respect of the unreported quantity, for instance, by an employer via supply deductions withheld. A corresponding provincial 10 per cent penalty can also be usually assessed.

Article content material

Article content material

Happily for me, this was the primary time I omitted earnings from a return, so I wasn’t assessed the repeated omission penalty, however was merely charged the tax on the dividends that I uncared for to report, together with some arrears curiosity.

However for me, the larger query was how may I’ve missed this T5 slip? My investigation started by pulling my 2023 paper file folder during which I had printed copies of varied tax slips, donation receipts, medical bills, and extra. There I discovered my T4 slip, some T3s and T5s, numerous different RRSP, charitable and medical receipts, however the lacking T5 was, effectively, lacking.

I then went on-line to the CRA My Account and, to my shock, the lacking 2023 T5 slip nonetheless wasn’t displaying up on-line, which is why the Autofill program, which I used final tax submitting season to import my tax slips, didn’t enter it. But the CRA clearly had a report of receiving it, because it was picked up by its matching program.

The following step was to show to my brokerage agency to seek out out why I by no means acquired that T5 slip within the mail, regardless of having acquired mailed copies of T5 and T3 slips for my different non-registered account. After some investigation, it was decided that I had chosen on-line tax reporting for this brokerage account, and, consequently, nothing was mailed and even emailed to alert me to go online to my on-line brokerage account, and obtain the T5 slip. Lesson discovered.

Article content material

Tax slips can even trigger issues for taxpayers who obtain multiple slip from the identical issuer. Are they duplicate slips, separate slips or amending slips? A current tax case determined earlier this month highlights one taxpayer’s bother with an amended slip.

The taxpayer is an actual property agent in British Columbia who integrated a private actual property company such that each one actual property commissions he earned had been earnings of the company. In 2019, the company acquired fee earnings from a single payor, which issued a T4A slip for 2019 within the quantity of $53,258. It then issued an amended T4A for 2019 within the quantity of $55,074.

The CRA then made, within the phrases of the Tax Court docket choose, “a silly mistake.” Slightly than recognizing that the amended T4A changed the unique T4A, the CRA added the quantity mirrored on the amended T4A to the quantity mirrored on the unique T4A, resulting in an faulty reassessment of the company’s earnings for 2019 of $108,332.

The taxpayer testified that he first heard from the CRA by letter in August 2022, proposing to reassess his company for T4A earnings of $108,332 for the 2019 taxation 12 months. The taxpayer testified that he referred to as the writer of that letter at the least twice. He mentioned that the writer of the letter agreed that solely the quantity mirrored on the amended T4A needs to be included within the company’s earnings. He made no notes of these conversations.

Article content material

The discover of reassessment for the 2019 taxation 12 months was posted on the company’s safe on-line account on October 12, 2022. Underneath the Revenue Tax Act, a taxpayer has 90 days to object to a discover of (re)evaluation, on this case that deadline being January 10, 2023. If a taxpayer misses the deadline, they’ll file an utility inside a 12 months asking the CRA to increase the time to object. The prolonged date would due to this fact be January 10, 2024. Sadly, the taxpayer didn’t object to the reassessment till March 24, 2024, which was too late.

In court docket, the taxpayer argued that he by no means noticed the discover of reassessment. Nevertheless, the CRA’s pc system confirmed that it was considered on-line on 4 separate events. However that, the taxpayer mentioned it was the CRA which erred in including the 2 T4A slips collectively.

Whereas the choose was sympathetic to the taxpayer’s scenario, his arms had been tied. As he wrote, “Though the (CRA) made a silly mistake in reassessing, I’ve no discretion to increase the time limitations set out within the Act. … Why this egregious error was not rectified by the CRA’s inner ‘high quality management’ stays a thriller.”

Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

When you preferred this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you have to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material