Close Menu
    Trending
    • Top 1% Income vs. Top 1% Net Worth: Which Is Harder to Get?
    • Rare Earths Americas IPO: Stock price will be closely watched today as ‘exploration stage’ firm lists on NYSE
    • Ten Key Enablers for 6G Wireless Communications
    • Kevin Hart Helps Offer $90K ‘Dream’ Role For Fans
    • Zelenskyy says Russia choosing war as dual ceasefires falter
    • What is the FDD, the pro-Israel think tank shaping Trump’s Iran policy? | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • The ‘MLB 500-home run club’ quiz
    • It’s never been easier to do too much
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times
    Opinions

    NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 21, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Re: “Disasters? What disasters? End to weather-loss tallies worries insurers” (Might 13, Nation & World):

    This text reported that the Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will not keep its database of local weather and climate disasters that triggered no less than $1 billion in damages because of “evolving priorities, statutory mandates, and staffing adjustments.”

    Sadly, the lack of this extensively used information supply will go away residents unable to trace and measure local weather and climate disasters, leaving it to insurance coverage corporations and others who’ve the sources to create their very own information system. The lack of NOAA’s correct and customarily accepted information will impression all of us.

    The info vacuum may very well be utilized by local weather deniers as one other device to downplay actuality. That’s not good for individuals who should pay for insurance coverage. It’s not good for any of us.

    Susan Oatis, Seattle

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    The Supreme Court just neutered the Voting Rights Act

    May 6, 2026

    WA income tax isn’t the budget savior governor, lawmakers are expecting

    May 5, 2026

    When companies with Seattle roots look outward, there’s no single reason

    May 5, 2026

    Ungovernable billionaires may be our biggest global threat

    May 5, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Steven Spielberg Drops Ominous ‘Disclosure Day’ Hint

    April 18, 2026

    The ‘NFL playoffs receiving yards leaders’ quiz

    July 15, 2025

    Why the Franchise Industry Has Its Own Day Now

    June 11, 2025

    Allbirds stock is already falling after the AI pivot. History suggests investors should proceed with caution

    April 16, 2026

    Oil prices mixed; Brent flat, US crude up as Iran keeps Hormuz shut ahead of Trump deadline

    April 7, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.