Close Menu
    Trending
    • Minnesota governor wants federal immigration agents out after Pretti killed | Protests News
    • Broncos must take an honest look at backfield after loss to Patriots
    • Truth decay: So much for Gavin Newsom saving local news in California
    • 5 Must-Have Loyalty App Software Features
    • Savannah Guthrie Reacts To Hearing Her New Voice
    • Life-saving aid reaches Kurdish-majority town: UN
    • What’s behind the recent shift in US defence strategy? | Donald Trump
    • Report tips Rams QB Matthew Stafford’s plans for 2026
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times
    Opinions

    NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 21, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    NOAA: ‘Data vacuum’ | The Seattle Times
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Re: “Disasters? What disasters? End to weather-loss tallies worries insurers” (Might 13, Nation & World):

    This text reported that the Nationwide Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will not keep its database of local weather and climate disasters that triggered no less than $1 billion in damages because of “evolving priorities, statutory mandates, and staffing adjustments.”

    Sadly, the lack of this extensively used information supply will go away residents unable to trace and measure local weather and climate disasters, leaving it to insurance coverage corporations and others who’ve the sources to create their very own information system. The lack of NOAA’s correct and customarily accepted information will impression all of us.

    The info vacuum may very well be utilized by local weather deniers as one other device to downplay actuality. That’s not good for individuals who should pay for insurance coverage. It’s not good for any of us.

    Susan Oatis, Seattle

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Truth decay: So much for Gavin Newsom saving local news in California

    January 25, 2026

    Too many kids already know someone who’s been deepfaked

    January 25, 2026

    What’s the endgame for Trump’s offensive against blue cities?

    January 25, 2026

    As the Rams come to Seattle, it’s time to stand for the Sound

    January 24, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    China urges end to ‘illegal’ sanctions as it hosts Iran nuclear talks

    March 14, 2025

    Hamas receives new Gaza truce plan: Official

    August 18, 2025

    Trump Vowed to End the Ukraine War Before Taking Office. The War Rages On.

    January 20, 2025

    FSU’s Norvell receiving one more chance to salvage career

    November 23, 2025

    Buccaneers address Todd Bowles hot seat rumors in big way

    June 26, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.