Close Menu
    Trending
    • How Much Money You Need to Be Wealthy: Survey
    • Nvidia becomes world’s first $4tn company
    • ‘A LOT OF BULLSH*T’: Trump Vents His Frustration With Putin, Lack of Progress in Peace Process in Ukraine, Announces New Defensive Weapons for Kiev, Floats New Sanctions on Moscow | The Gateway Pundit
    • Candace Bure’s Marriage Saved By Son’s 45-Minute Sermon
    • Deadly temperatures blasted western Europe in record hot June
    • European heatwave caused 2,300 deaths in 10 days, study finds | Climate Crisis News
    • Former first-round pick gets traded for second time in two days
    • The Cost of Supercommuting: Way More Than Just Gas Money
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times
    Opinions

    Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 28, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Re: “This is not the time for Supreme Court to weaken federal judiciary” (Could 21, Opinion):

    Studying Erwin Chermerinsky’s column on the potential weakening of the federal judiciary introduced again to thoughts Colorado’s invoking of the 14th Modification to maintain President Donald Trump off the poll for participating in rebel.

    Now a case of a clearly unconstitutional govt order rescinding birthright citizenship for some has devolved into whether or not a regional federal decide’s opinion ought to maintain sway over the complete nation. Within the Colorado case, the query turned whether or not a state had the precise to disqualify a presidential candidate when it was the candidate who disqualified himself.

    Attorneys, and justices, delight themselves in going additional into the weeds than lay folks. Apparently for them, the query wouldn’t have been whether or not the emperor had no garments however whether or not the boy had standing to say so.

    Thomas Rogers, Vashon

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    The Seattle Times editorial board recommends: Janis White for Seattle School Board, District 5

    July 9, 2025

    Drought: Use water wisely | The Seattle Times

    July 9, 2025

    Stars and Stripes: Uncertainty | The Seattle Times

    July 9, 2025

    Congress: Meaningless promises | The Seattle Times

    July 9, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    New WA law will help ferry system, but there’s still work to do

    May 21, 2025

    HERE WE GO: President Trump said Elon Was “Wearing Thin” So He “Asked Him To Leave” – Musk Responds with Taunt About Epstein Files | The Gateway Pundit

    June 5, 2025

    How AI Can Help You Cut Through Tariff Chaos — in Just 3 Simple Steps

    May 20, 2025

    Merz Prepared To Punish Hungary For Anti-War Policies

    April 2, 2025

    Andy Cohen Responds To The Rumors About His Dating Life

    May 10, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.