Close Menu
    Trending
    • Capital One just made a $5.15 billion move that could change how businesses manage money
    • Sense of Relief Spreads Among European Leaders Over De-Escalation of Greenland Crisis
    • The advantages of being a young entrepreneur
    • Aaron Rodgers’ Secret Wife Has Been ‘Found’ By Two Podcasters
    • Trump touts ‘total access’ Greenland deal as NATO asks allies to step up
    • ‘Will act accordingly’: US threatens action against Haitian council | Government News
    • Rangers acquire All-Star LHP MacKenzie Gore in win-now move
    • At Davos, Trump delivers another disturbing doozy
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Sports»What can the Thunder change to take Game 2 of the NBA Finals?
    Sports

    What can the Thunder change to take Game 2 of the NBA Finals?

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJune 8, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    What can the Thunder change to take Game 2 of the NBA Finals?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Previous to Recreation 1 of the NBA Finals, this author listed five pressure points that would determine the championship. Some got here to gentle even within the collection opener with one. The Oklahoma Metropolis Thunder shelved their two-big lineup half-hour previous to tip off!

    Earlier than this night’s second contest, let’s check out what the Thunder may have the ability to do to keep away from dropping each residence video games and, greater than doubtless, the collection to the Indiana Pacers.

    Profitable the turnover battle isn’t sufficient

    The Thunder’s means to show their opposition over was, as anticipated, overwhelming. What was shocking was their incapability to show dwell ball errors into transition baskets. Indiana dedicated a ridiculous 20 first-half turnovers in Recreation 1, but OKC solely generated 9 factors from stated turnovers. A part of that was luck, with 11 of these turnovers being dead-ball and, by definition, stopping Thunder runouts.

    The opposite issue was excellent defensive transition from Indiana. Little question Pacers coach Rick Carlisle, whose genius is lastly being acknowledged, had his group prepped to retreat with haste each time the ball was misplaced, however the Thunder merely weren’t ruthless sufficient on the basket, nor did they leak out in numbers typically sufficient. It resulted in a 12-point halftime margin, when it in all probability ought to have been double that.

    Do ‘Plan A’ higher

    Broadcaster Richard Jefferson referred to as Mark Daignault’s resolution to begin guard Cason Wallace instead of middle Isaiah Hartenstein a psychological win for Indiana, who had already made the Thunder deviate from two-big Plan A earlier than the gamers took to the ground.

    The justification for the transfer made sufficient sense, however a crossmatch can work each methods. Whereas Wallace clearly contributed to Indiana’s first-half turnover fest, Pascal Siakam was capable of hunt mismatches, his offense virtually single-handedly maintaining Indiana within the contest via the primary half. His peak and energy had been merely overwhelming for Jalen Williams, Wallace, and even the cinderblock that’s Lu Dort. It additionally meant that the Thunder didn’t have backline assist with Holmgren having to respect Myles Turner’s exterior risk.

    On the different finish, Holmgren was outmuscled by Myles Turner, resulting in an abysmal, six-point (2/9 from the sector) efficiency. For all his on-ball expertise, Holmgren merely doesn’t have the heft to play on the ring in opposition to behemoths. Hartenstein unlocks a lot of what makes Chet tick. Anticipate Daignault to place Holmgren ready to excel in Recreation 2.

    Shai wants some assist

    Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was excellent in Recreation 1, pouring in 38 factors at close to 50% effectivity. He was unstoppable from inside and outside. But, you possibly can’t assist feeling like that was the Pacers’ plan.

    As talked about within the Strain Factors piece, Indiana has let one participant get theirs all via these playoffs however shut the provision for the supporting forged. Dort is just not more likely to hit 5 threes once more this collection so — to not go all Stephen A. Smith — one (or each) of Williams and Holmgren have to step up.





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Rangers acquire All-Star LHP MacKenzie Gore in win-now move

    January 23, 2026

    Denny Hamlin ‘considered all options’ before deciding to race in 2026

    January 22, 2026

    Golf power rankings for the 2026 season: Scottie Scheffler on top

    January 22, 2026

    Insider offers explanation for why Bucs retained Todd Bowles

    January 22, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Sweetgreen Layoffs: Cutting Support Staff, Ripple Fries

    August 8, 2025

    Activists back US professor ‘forced’ from Columbia over Palestine advocacy | Israel-Palestine conflict News

    January 12, 2025

    Garrett’s wild comment about Rodgers not a ringing endorsement

    June 12, 2025

    US to initially impose ‘small tariff’ on pharma imports, Trump says

    August 5, 2025

    Mourning Robert Redford Made ‘Extra Challenging’ by AI

    November 25, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.