Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel lately met with New York Occasions columnist Ross Douthat to debate many subjects, together with innovation, life extension expertise, the antichrist, and transhumanism.
The subject of transhumanism was introduced up when Douthat requested Thiel, “Ought to the human race survive?”
Thiel responded, “Sure. However I additionally would really like us to radically remedy these issues. And so it’s all the time, I don’t know, yeah — transhumanism.”
The co-founder of Palantir added, “The best was this radical transformation the place your human, pure physique will get remodeled into an immortal physique.”
He later said that transgenderism doesn’t go far sufficient in relation to altering one’s physique and shared, “We would like greater than cross-dressing or altering your intercourse organs. We would like you to have the ability to change your coronary heart and alter your thoughts and alter your complete physique.”
WATCH:
I utterly agree with Thiel. After all we need to enhance ourselves. After all we need to obtain mastery over our flesh. After all we need to advance to date that someday we’d not be recognizable as human. pic.twitter.com/wvcLUihlIs
— Hunter Ash (@ArtemisConsort) June 29, 2025
In case you’re unfamiliar with transhumanism, it’s an ideology that promotes utilizing expertise and science to boost human capabilities.
Primarily, transhumanists welcome an period the place people merge with machines.
Later within the interview, Thiel and Douthat focus on the antichrist.
Thiel shared that “The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you discuss Armageddon nonstop. You discuss existential threat nonstop, and that is what it is advisable to regulate.”
The New York Times offered a transcript:
Douthat: You might have been giving talks lately concerning the idea of the Antichrist, which is a Christian idea, an apocalyptic idea. What does that imply to you? What’s the Antichrist?
Thiel: All proper. Effectively, I may discuss it for a very long time. I feel there’s all the time a query of how we articulate a few of these existential dangers, a few of the challenges we have now, and so they’re all framed on this kind of runaway dystopian science textual content. There’s a threat of nuclear battle, there’s a threat of environmental catastrophe. Possibly one thing particular, like local weather change, though there are many different ones we’ve give you. There’s a threat of bioweapons. You might have all of the totally different sci-fi situations. Clearly, there are specific forms of dangers with A.I.
Thiel: However I all the time assume that if we’re going to have this body of speaking about existential dangers, maybe we must also speak concerning the threat of one other kind of a nasty singularity, which I might describe because the one-world totalitarian state. As a result of I might say the default political resolution folks have for all these existential dangers is one-world governance. What do you do about nuclear weapons? Now we have a United Nations with actual tooth that controls them, and so they’re managed by a world political order. After which one thing like that is additionally: What will we do about A.I.? And we want world compute governance. We’d like a one-world authorities to manage all of the computer systems, log each single keystroke, to verify folks don’t program a harmful A.I. And I’ve been questioning whether or not that’s going from the frying pan into the fireplace.
Thiel: The atheist philosophical framing is “One World or None.” That was a brief movie that was put out by the Federation of American Scientists within the late ’40s. It begins with the nuclear bomb blowing up the world, and clearly, you want a one-world authorities to cease it — one world or none. And the Christian framing, which in some methods is similar query, is: Antichrist or Armageddon? You might have the one-world state of the Antichrist, or we’re sleepwalking towards Armageddon. “One world or none,” “Antichrist or Armageddon,” on one degree, are the identical query.
Thiel: It’s a really implausible plot gap. However I feel we have now a solution to this plot gap. The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you discuss Armageddon nonstop. You discuss existential threat nonstop, and that is what it is advisable to regulate. It’s the alternative of the image of Baconian science from the seventeenth, 18th century, the place the Antichrist is like some evil tech genius, evil scientist who invents this machine to take over the world. Individuals are method too scared for that.
Thiel: In our world, the factor that has political resonance is the alternative. The factor that has political resonance is: We have to cease science, we have to simply say “cease” to this. And that is the place, within the seventeenth century, I can think about a Dr. Strangelove, Edward Teller-type individual taking on the world. In our world, it’s much more more likely to be Greta Thunberg.
WATCH:
Peter Thiel is requested why he’s not the Antichrist he warns about if he’s actively constructing authoritarian rule through army and surveillance applied sciences
“These are totally different situations…clearly I don’t assume that that’s what I’m doing” pic.twitter.com/cDEdAW1Eqs
— HOT SPOT (@HotSpotHotSpot) June 27, 2025
You possibly can watch the whole interview under:
