Close Menu
    Trending
    • Be Careful Buying The Dip Too Often, Too Soon
    • How to tell if it’s time for a career pivot
    • Coverting ECM Dates | Armstrong Economics
    • Timothée Chalamet Steals Critics Choice Night With One Moment
    • Venezuela’s Maduro due in US court, substitute leader softens stance
    • Why was Ruben Amorim sacked as Man United manager? | Football News
    • ‘SNF’ takeaways: Steelers take down Ravens in thriller to win AFC North, clinch final playoff spot
    • Here’s what experts expect from AI in 2026
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Sea-Tac expansion: Health, environment | The Seattle Times
    Opinions

    Sea-Tac expansion: Health, environment | The Seattle Times

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 3, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Sea-Tac expansion: Health, environment | The Seattle Times
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Re: “Sea-Tac must modernize to meet the needs of a growing region” (Dec. 31, Opinion):

    Seattle-Tacoma Worldwide Airport’s modernization ought to concentrate on good development, not aviation sprawl. For communities across the airport, the Port of Seattle’s pursuit of development has meant many years of well being harms and environmental injustice.

    The editorial’s reference to shifting “cargo amenities off web site” is a euphemism. In actuality, it has meant clear reducing close by forests to construct cargo warehouses — typically for Amazon packages — destroying tree cover that when helped take up air pollution, noise, warmth and flooding.

    Transferring impacts off airport property doesn’t scale back hurt; it shifts it to much less highly effective communities whereas stripping away essential environmental protections. A greater passenger expertise shouldn’t come on the expense of public well being and the setting.

    Sandy Shettler, Tree Motion Seattle

    Letters editor: If you need to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Washington state budget: A spending problem?

    January 5, 2026

    Sick of Trump news? I’m here for you

    January 4, 2026

    How the White House lost the public on immigration

    January 4, 2026

    Dismiss the Doomsday Clock at your own peril

    January 4, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    U.S. needs immigrants to sustain the health care workforce

    December 23, 2025

    Hidden history of nuclear weapons written in unacknowledged victims

    August 29, 2025

    Ten Overvalued/Undervalued players in fantasy football entering training camp

    July 28, 2025

    Andrew, Tristan Tate under criminal probe in US state of Florida | Sexual Assault News

    March 5, 2025

    Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Urged By Legal Experts To Get A Prenup

    August 28, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.