Close Menu
    Trending
    • Seattle Times endorsements, WA primary 2026: King County Council, District 8
    • A new court ruling could shape how Americans vote in the next election
    • Why GTA 6 is launching without a disc – and what it says about gaming’s future
    • Will Smith Fans Go After Jada Pinkett Over ‘Harsh’ Act In Video
    • Commentary: Micron’s huge AI windfall is bad news for most of us
    • US judge holds prosecutor in contempt in Charlie Kirk murder case | Courts News
    • Jose Alvarado’s new deal will help Knicks remain contenders
    • We must balance competing needs on Seattle’s working waterfront
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Gas Works Park: Support middle path
    Opinions

    Gas Works Park: Support middle path

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 31, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Gas Works Park: Support middle path
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    I’d wish to appropriate a false impression that Jean Sherrard promulgated in his Now & Then column (“Past, present, future: Balancing safety and art at Gas Works Park,” Jan. 25, Pacific NW Journal). He presents the present choices on the desk as “a seemingly unimaginable binary: go away the hazard as it’s, or take away it totally.” This isn’t the case in any respect.

    The Seattle Parks Division has introduced a nicely thought out center path calling for the elimination of all catwalks and ladders. The Parks proposal, introduced to the Landmarks Preservation Board on Jan. 21, removes probably the most tempting climbing targets whereas retaining the majority of the towers. Thus the park would retain probably the most outstanding historic fixtures whereas drastically decreasing the chance of harm and loss of life.

    The proposal was tabled by the Landmarks Board pending extra info from the Parks division. I’m hopeful that the extra info may be offered promptly and that the Landmarks Board will approve it swiftly to stop any extra tragedies at Gasoline Works Park.

    Tim O’Connor, Seattle

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought of for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Seattle Times endorsements, WA primary 2026: King County Council, District 8

    June 27, 2026

    We must balance competing needs on Seattle’s working waterfront

    June 26, 2026

    Reflecting Pool holds a mirror to Trump’s administration 

    June 26, 2026

    President Narcissus and the fetid reflecting pool

    June 26, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Jimmy Kimmel Looked Somber In First Outing After ABC Axed His Show

    September 19, 2025

    Hollywood is freaking out over a viral AI video showing Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise fighting

    February 19, 2026

    EU Commissioner Blames Stagflation On War

    May 19, 2026

    En Suite Bathrooms: The Secret to The Perfect Guest-Ready Home

    June 30, 2025

    Who will own the app and how will it work?

    September 23, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.