Close Menu
    Trending
    • A bold new plan for state news fellowship: Cover every county
    • Denmark’s child care and parental leave policies erase 80% of the ‘motherhood penalty’
    • Keir Starmer Apologizes to Epstein’s Victims For Appointing Mandelson
    • Quantum Twins: Silicon’s Leap in Analog Simulation
    • France charges four suspected of spying for China: prosecutor
    • US envoy shuns Polish parliament speaker over Trump remarks | Donald Trump News
    • 10 U.S. athletes to know ahead of the 2026 Winter Olympics
    • ICE isn’t just breaking the law. It’s trying to rewrite it
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»ICE isn’t just breaking the law. It’s trying to rewrite it
    Opinions

    ICE isn’t just breaking the law. It’s trying to rewrite it

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseFebruary 5, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    ICE isn’t just breaking the law. It’s trying to rewrite it
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    In an outrageous enlargement of its authority, Immigration and Customs Enforcement is now authorizing its brokers to arrest anybody they believe of being undocumented, even when the officers don’t have a warrant and the particular person isn’t a flight threat.

    The directive, contained in a memo obtained by The New York Instances, reverses long-standing ICE coverage and successfully renders the warrant requirement itself empty. Approaching the heels of one other legally indefensible memo, which purported to permit ICE brokers to enter the properties of suspected undocumented folks with no judicial warrant, the brand new coverage exhibits that ICE isn’t simply exploiting authorized loopholes to create huge sweeps. As an alternative, it reveals an company actively making an attempt to alter the authorized panorama to show itself into an omnipotent police drive.

    Federal regulation permits ICE to make warrantless arrests beneath solely two circumstances. The primary is when an agent sees somebody actively crossing the border illegally. That state of affairs isn’t related to the present ICE sweeps, which happen in cities removed from the border.

    The second scenario during which the regulation permits a warrantless arrest, the one addressed by the brand new memo, is that if an ICE officer “has purpose to consider” that somebody is within the U.S. with out authorized authority and “is prone to escape earlier than a warrant will be obtained for his arrest.”

    As even ICE has been pressured to acknowledge, the phrase “purpose to consider” within the statute signifies that the agent will need to have possible trigger to suppose that the particular person is undocumented. That normal, borrowed from the context of prison arrest, seems protecting of particular person rights.

    However in a call in its emergency docket final September, the Supreme Court docket disastrously eroded this safety by permitting road stops primarily based merely on “cheap suspicion” — a regular decrease than possible trigger. A solo opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh then prolonged cheap suspicion to incorporate components like showing Latino and talking Spanish.

    That brings us to the brand new memo, which addresses whether or not ICE brokers can then arrest the one that has been stopped. Till now, it has been the long-standing observe of ICE to allow warrantless arrests solely when the officers decided that the particular person stopped was a flight threat, that means that they’d be unlikely to indicate up for a court docket listening to. And till now, ICE has acknowledged that this rule was required by the statute’s demand that somebody be “prone to escape” earlier than they are often arrested with no warrant. In observe, that made it comparatively uncommon for ICE brokers to hold out a warrantless arrest.

    The brand new memo basically transforms the that means of the phrases “prone to escape.” It claims that an individual who has been stopped is prone to escape if they’re “unlikely to be situated on the scene of the encounter” by the point an arrest warrant might be obtained. Since nearly anybody would stroll away from an ICE arrest if they may (not less than beneath present circumstances), it follows from this interpretation that anybody stopped by ICE is “prone to escape” — and subsequently could also be subjected to warrantless arrest.

    The memo says that ICE’s earlier place in regards to the that means of the statute was “unreasoned” and “incorrect.” Nevertheless it’s the brand new interpretation that’s unreasoned and incorrect. In response to ICE’s interpretation, there could be no purpose to ever require the issuance of a warrant, on condition that ICE brokers can, beneath the brand new concept, successfully arrest anybody who wouldn’t stick round as soon as stopped. Put one other means, ICE’s new interpretation turns the statute right into a lifeless letter.

    I understand all these authorized technical particulars are rather a lot. So let me put it merely. Underneath the brand new memo, ICE brokers can detain anybody they suppose is perhaps undocumented, primarily based on components like ethnic look, language and the place you occur to be hanging out once they cease you. As soon as they’ve stopped you, they’ll declare to have possible trigger that you simply’re undocumented (for instance, since you don’t have proof of citizenship on you). Then the officers can merely arrest you, with no warrant.

    The overall bundle quantities to a sweeping authorization for ICE brokers to roam the streets, seize nearly anybody they need, arrest and detain them.

    It’s not solely that such proceedings are un-American. It’s that they’re plainly illegal beneath the authorized regime that’s supposed to use. The warrant requirement for an ICE arrest, established by statute, is supposed to perform as a safety in opposition to precisely the form of huge, nonspecific sweeps ICE is now performing.

    Equally, the requirement of a judicial warrant earlier than getting into a house is a foundational safeguard of particular person liberty.

    The excellent news about ICE’s makes an attempt to get across the regulation is that they are going to come earlier than the courts. The courts ought to affirm that the statute means what it says: “prone to escape” signifies that ICE might not arrest an individual with no warrant until they’re a flight threat. Judicial interpretation of federal regulation is a cornerstone of preserving the rule of regulation itself. ICE’s actions are terrifying, and meant to be, however the regulation stays one of many instruments that can be utilized to withstand a descent right into a police state.

    Noah Feldman: is a Bloomberg opinion columnist. A professor of regulation at Harvard College, he’s writer, most lately, of “To Be a Jew At the moment: A New Information to God, Israel, and the Jewish Folks.”

    ©2026 Bloomberg L.P. Go to bloomberg.com/opinion. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    A bold new plan for state news fellowship: Cover every county

    February 5, 2026

    Con: Proposed WA income tax will just grow and grow

    February 5, 2026

    Pro: Income tax would fix WA’s broken, unfair system

    February 4, 2026

    Speak up for local news, Washington

    February 4, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How China forgot promises and ‘debts’ to Ukraine, and backed Russia’s war | Russia-Ukraine war News

    September 8, 2025

    Washington state budget: A spending problem?

    January 5, 2026

    Public deserves answers about arrests at Bear Gulch wildfire

    September 4, 2025

    Five worst signings from the first day of NHL free agency

    July 2, 2025

    Yankees slammed for polarizing move in Game 1 loss to Red Sox

    October 1, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.