Close Menu
    Trending
    • Why This RN Left the Hospital to Start Her Own Business
    • What are the protesting laws in the UK after Palestine Action were proscrtibed?
    • Xbox producer suggests laid-off staff use AI to deal with emotions
    • Houston Leftist Booted from Food Insecurity Board After VILE Comment Calling Missing Girls’ Flooded Camp “White-Only Girls Camp” | The Gateway Pundit
    • Justin Bieber Declares Love But Fans Aren’t Buying It
    • EU hopes for Trump tariff deal by July deadline after ‘good exchange’
    • FIFA Club World Cup semi: Chelsea vs Fluminense team news, start and lineup | Football News
    • Two American women trying to snap nine-year Wimbledon drought
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Trending News»Trump must be sentenced in hush money case, judge signals no jail
    Trending News

    Trump must be sentenced in hush money case, judge signals no jail

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 4, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Trump must be sentenced in hush money case, judge signals no jail
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    NEW YORK: US President-elect Donald Trump can be sentenced on Jan 10 within the felony case through which he was convicted on charges involving hush cash paid to a porn star, however is unlikely to face jail time, a decide stated on Friday (Dec 3).

    Justice Juan Merchan’s ruling means Trump can be required to seem at a court docket listening to simply 10 days earlier than his Jan 20 inauguration – an unprecedented state of affairs in US historical past.

    Earlier than Trump, no US president – former or sitting – had been charged with or convicted of against the law.

    The decide stated Trump, 78, might seem at his sentencing both in particular person or nearly.

    He wrote that he was not inclined to condemn Trump to jail, and {that a} sentence of “unconditional discharge” – which means no custody, financial advantageous, or probation – could be “essentially the most viable resolution”.

    In a press release, Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung stated there must be no sentencing within the case.

    “This lawless case ought to have by no means been introduced, and the Structure calls for that or not it’s instantly dismissed,” Cheung stated.

    Merchan introduced his plan for the sentencing in denying Trump’s movement to dismiss the case on account of his presidential election victory. Trump’s defence attorneys had argued that having the case hold over him throughout his presidency would impede his means to control.

    Merchan rejected that argument, writing that setting apart the jury’s verdict would “undermine the rule of regulation in immeasurable methods.”

    “Defendant’s standing as president-elect doesn’t require the drastic and ‘uncommon’ software of (the court docket’s) authority to grant the (dismissal) movement,” Merchan wrote within the choice.

    Merchan additionally rejected Trump’s argument in a Dec 3 court docket submitting that dismissal was warranted as a result of his “civic and monetary contributions to this metropolis and the nation are too quite a few to depend”.

    Whereas acknowledging Trump’s service as president, the decide stated Trump’s public statements excoriating the justice system had been additionally an element for him in figuring out how Trump’s character would issue into the choice.

    Merchan criticised what he known as Trump’s “unrelenting and unsubstantiated assaults” in opposition to the integrity of the felony continuing, and famous that he had discovered him responsible of 10 counts of contempt throughout the trial for repeatedly violating an order limiting out-of-court statements about witnesses and others.

    “Defendant has gone to nice lengths to broadcast on social media and different boards his lack of respect for judges, juries, grand juries and the justice system as an entire,” Merchan wrote.

    “Defendant’s character and historical past vis-a-vis the rule of regulation and the third department of presidency have to be analysed,” the decide stated, referring to the judiciary. “In that vein, it doesn’t weigh in his favour.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    EU hopes for Trump tariff deal by July deadline after ‘good exchange’

    July 7, 2025

    China says BRICS not seeking ‘confrontation’ after Trump tariff threat

    July 7, 2025

    Australian Erin Patterson found guilty of all counts in mushroom murders case

    July 7, 2025

    Trump says tariff letters to go out to other countries on Monday

    July 7, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Taylor Swift Slammed Over Lyric Dubbed ‘Peak MySpace Trash’

    May 30, 2025

    FANTASYLAND: Pathetic Never-Trump Republicans Predict Democrats Poised for Big Comeback Win in 2028 | The Gateway Pundit

    January 28, 2025

    NATO Quest For War With Russia

    April 24, 2025

    No, Elon Musk hasn’t ‘discovered’ fraud at Social Security

    February 23, 2025

    Germany’s Conspiracy Theory Hotline | Armstrong Economics

    May 12, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.