QUESTION: You might have supplied an actual historical past of this fixed risk that Iran can have a nuclear weapon, with Netanyahu’s private obsession with attacking Iran for 40 years. My query is what’s the distinction that Iran would have a nuclear weapon and that of North Korea or Pakistan? They’ve nuclear weapons, however that doesn’t imply they use them. It appears to me that the risk implies that Netanyahu can not invade Iran. Am I lacking one thing?
RK
ANSWER: No. This appears to be an obsession of Netanyahu’s. Iran wouldn’t immediately use it to assault Israel, for they know they might be annihilated in return. That’s the reason Pakistan and North Korea don’t use them. They’re extra of a deterrent. You might have carried out the identical to North Korea to “forestall” it from creating a nuke. I’ve zero respect for Netanyahu, and I consider he’s probably the most harmful risk to Israel.
