Blake Lively Calls Out Justin Baldoni’s New Move Aimed At Taylor Swift

In a brand new submitting, the actress argued that her “It Ends With Us” co-star waited too lengthy to make this transfer, noting that he failed to take action inside the earlier months and that the alleged timing of the deposition falls after the shut of discovery.

Justin Baldoni and Blake Vigorous are at present embroiled in a sexual harassment lawsuit, which Vigorous filed towards Baldoni following their work collectively on the movie.

Lower than 24 hours after Justin Baldoni’s crew filed paperwork claiming Taylor Swift had agreed to sit down for a deposition, Blake Vigorous fired again with a response, urging the courtroom to grant the actor any extra time to depose the singer.

In her personal submitting on September 12, Vigorous’s authorized crew argued that Baldoni had delayed too lengthy in searching for the deposition, mentioning that “discovery has been ongoing for greater than six months.”

They additional claimed Baldoni’s attorneys didn’t attain out to Swift’s representatives till earlier this week, and even when she had agreed, the proposed dates of October 20–25 fall exterior the courtroom’s discovery deadline.

“At any level over the previous six months, [Baldoni’s team] may have observed a deposition, served a subpoena, and negotiated an agreeable time and place for this deposition. However they didn’t,” learn the submitting, per Us Weekly.

It additional learn, “Now,  lengthy after dates and places for all different social gathering and third-party witnesses have been negotiated and agreed to [they have] come to this Court docket and demand the best to take this deposition — and this deposition alone — greater than three weeks after the shut of reality discovery and ten days after the events are attributable to change professional experiences.”

In her submitting, Vigorous additionally blasted Baldoni, arguing that his push for a deposition at this stage confirmed a “lack of diligence” and a disregard for Swift’s “privateness and schedule.”

She additional claimed that the actor supposed to make use of the deposition to create a “media spectacle on this matter,” seemingly referencing how Baldoni and his crew dragged Swift into the lawsuit by repeatedly mentioning her in courtroom paperwork and issuing a subpoena to depose her months earlier than however later withdrawing it.

“Such a displaying can be anticipated for any deposition occurring after the shut of discovery, particularly so for a 3rd social gathering, however is much more related for this third social gathering, whom [Baldoni’s team] have constantly sought to make use of to generate a media spectacle on this matter,” the submitting additionally learn.

Swift’s lawyer has since slammed the declare from Baldoni’s camp that she has agreed to be deposed in his ongoing authorized feud along with her former pal, Vigorous.

Based on the Daily Mail, the lawyer famous that the singer will solely take part if compelled by regulation to take action, stressing that she has no “materials function” within the former co-stars’ courtroom case.

A letter from Swift’s authorized crew learn partially: “Additional, my shopper didn’t comply with a deposition, but when she is pressured right into a deposition, we suggested (after first listening to in regards to the deposition simply three days in the past) that her schedule would accommodate the time required through the week of October 20 if the events had been capable of work out their disputes.”

Forward of the trial in Might 2026, Baldoni’s protection has been struggling some losses, with one of many newest being a decide’s choice to chop Vigorous’s deposition from the courtroom docket, per Deadline.

“The Wayfarer Events’ attachment of your entire, practically 300-page deposition—after citing solely two pages of it within the Letter—served no correct litigation objective and as an alternative seems to have been supposed to burden Vigorous (and in consequence, the Court docket) and to ask public hypothesis and scandal,” stated Choose Lewis Liman, refrencing Baldoni and his fellow defendants that make up the Wayfarer Events.

Liman had made the order in response to Vigorous’s movement to maintain her deposition sealed, during which he additionally claimed that the Wayfarer Events failed to indicate your entire deposition was related to their case, nor may they.

He added, The conclusion is inescapable that the Wayfarer Events filed gratuitous quantities of irrelevant pages in order that, if Vigorous moved for continued sealing of the irrelevant pages, the Wayfarer Events may then use Vigorous’s response for their very own public-relations functions.”