The Appellate Temporary for Tina Peters has been filed.
On Saturday, the Appellate Temporary for Tina Peters was filed.
Treniss Evans shared the information on social media.
Evans thanked the good Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for his or her unimaginable generosity and tireless dedication.
He additionally thanks the next for his or her work in placing it collectively – Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good.
BREAKING!!! Tina Peters Appellate Temporary Filed!
Thanks, Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good. The staff at AMERICAN RIGHTS ALLIANCE delivered, and particular due to the good Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for his or her unimaginable generosity and tireless dedication!
That is gold, and we hope to see speedy motion on the standing for Tina Peters. I’m honored to work with so many wonderful and proficient individuals!
BREAKING!!! Tina Peters Appellate Temporary Filed!
Thanks, Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good. The staff at AMERICAN RIGHTS ALLIANCE delivered, and particular due to the good Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for his or her…— Treniss J. Evans III (@CondemnedUSA) May 31, 2025
Listed below are the problems on enchantment addressed within the doc:
ISSUES ON APPEAL
1. Whether or not the district courtroom erred as a matter of regulation in denying Ms. Peters’ movement to dismiss primarily based on her declare of immunity pursuant to the Supremacy Clause and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the U.S. Structure.
2. Whether or not the proof was inadequate.
3. Whether or not the courtroom denied Ms. Peters due course of.
a. Whether or not the district courtroom disadvantaged Ms. Peters of a significant alternative to current a whole protection.
b. Whether or not the courtroom erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the statutory protection of execution of a public obligation, and the federal constitutional protection of Supremacy Clause immunity.
c. Whether or not Ms. Peters had ample discover of the fees.
d. Whether or not the prosecution misled the jury by stating repeatedly that Ms. Peters’ conduct precipitated a “safety breach.”
e. Whether or not the courtroom erred by refusing to carry a listening to to analyze allegations of improper juror conduct.
f. Whether or not the prosecutor’s false assertion in rebuttal closing requires a brand new trial.4. Whether or not the district courtroom’s sentence violated the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and whether or not the sentence was primarily based partially on a contempt conviction that was later vacated by the Court docket of Appeals.
See the Temporary beneath:
Tina Peters FINAL Appellate Brief by Joe Ho on Scribd
The publish BREAKING: The Appellate Brief for Tina Peters Has Been Filed – See It Here first appeared on Joe Hoft.
The publish BREAKING: The Appellate Brief for Tina Peters Has Been Filed – See It Here appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
