In 1874, through the transient period of Reconstruction, white individuals staged a racist rebellion in New Orleans. Angered by the presence of African Individuals in regulation enforcement and different authorities posts, members of the Crescent Metropolis White League stormed the native customs home and killed 11 police officers.
Two years later, a contested presidential election led to the withdrawal of U.S. troops from the South and the tip of Reconstruction. In 1891, New Orleans erected a memorial to White League members who died within the 1874 riot. And in 1932, town affixed a plaque to the memorial stating that the 1876 election “acknowledged white supremacy within the South and gave us our state.”
However you’ll be able to’t see the memorial — or its plaque — in New Orleans any longer. It was taken down in 2017, following years of protest by civil rights advocates.
I’ve been desirous about that episode over the previous few months, as President Donald Trump’s administration steps up its efforts to purge our historic panorama of something remotely destructive about the US. In March, it ordered the Smithsonian Institution to eradicate “improper, divisive or anti-American ideology” from its museums. And in my hometown of Philadelphia, over a dozen displays about slavery at Independence National Park — together with an exhibit describing George Washington as an enslaver — have been flagged for overview.
Like different liberal historians, I’m outraged by Trump’s cowardly assaults on our guild. A nation that actually believed in its “greatness” — a time period the president loves to make use of — wouldn’t be afraid to confront its worst chapters.
However I believe my fellow liberals have been complicit — to borrow the time period du jour — in historic censorship too. No one on my aspect of the political aisle objected when the New Orleans monument got here down. As an alternative, we celebrated a victory over hate and bigotry.
I’m not saying that racist memorials ought to stay on their pedestals. However once they’re pulled down, they need to be positioned some other place the place we will see them. In any other case, we received’t study the terrible historical past they embody.
Think about the destiny of Silent Sam, the Accomplice statue that stood for over a century on the campus of the College of North Carolina. It, too, was constructed to extol white supremacy: At its unveiling in 1913, a UNC trustee said that Accomplice troopers had “saved the very lifetime of the Anglo Saxon race within the South.”
However in 2018, demonstrators pulled down Silent Sam. And when UNC Chancellor Carol Folt proposed that the statue be displayed in a museum, the college erupted in but extra protest.
In a statement, the college’s psychology division mentioned that preserving Silent Sam in any type on campus would “create a hostile studying atmosphere for black college students.” The monument “undermines our shared group values of equality, respect, and acceptance of all individuals,” the division added.
A couple of months later, Folt caved and declared that Silent Sam could be faraway from campus. Its presence at UNC — even in a museum — posed a menace to the “well-being of our group,” she mentioned.
Sound like anybody you understand? In his fulminations in opposition to allegedly “divisive” historical past, Trump insists that it threatens the complete American group. By casting the US “in a destructive gentle,” Trump warns, historians are selling “a way of nationwide disgrace.” As an alternative, we ought to be “instilling pleasure within the hearts of all Individuals.”
In different phrases: smiley faces solely, please. Some issues are simply too troubling to see. So let’s take them down, or blot them out, so we will all really feel higher.
False equivalence alert: Trump is clearly in search of to suppress information of white racism, whereas the statue protesters had been making an attempt — in good religion — to guard nonwhite races from hateful symbols. And he’s the president, after all, so he has vastly extra energy than anyone else.
However the upshot is precisely the identical: Historical past will get censored. And we condescend to Individuals after we think about they’ll’t deal with it.
We see an identical dynamic within the ongoing debate over ebook bans in faculties and libraries. I’m appalled by latest efforts by right-wing ideologues to take away works by Toni Morrison, Maya Angelou and lots of others. However the place had been my fellow liberals when faculties had been dropping “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn“ as a result of it makes use of the N-word 200 instances? Sitting on their fingers or cheering from the sidelines, as one other reminder of racism bit the mud.
That was the “good” type of censorship, as a result of we did it. And we’re good.
However each act of historic suppression is dangerous information, for all of us. That’s why I used to be glad to learn that the New Orleans monument will be part of forthcoming exhibit on the Museum of Modern Artwork in Los Angeles. The exhibit “displays on the histories and legacies of post-Civil Battle America as they proceed to resonate at this time” by displaying “monuments within the exhibition shall be proven of their various states of transformation,” a museum news release declares.
That’s exactly why we have to see these symbols: to grasp who we’re, how we acquired right here and the place we have to go. We’re in a state of transformation, too, and we should not look away. That’s what Trump desires us to do.
©2025 Chicago Tribune. Go to at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
