As Kenya prepares for its subsequent basic election, due in lower than 20 months’ time, 2026 will show to be a crucial 12 months. With native and international restraints on political violence being hollowed out on the very time when belief within the credibility of the election system is at an all-time low, severe hassle beckons except pressing steps are taken.
Violence in Kenyan elections is never the product of that perennial bogeyman, tribalism. It’s virtually solely a state-generated phenomenon that requires a specific alignment of circumstances. Two matter above all else: first, whether or not the election itself is credible; second, whether or not the incumbent is operating for re-election.
For the reason that reintroduction of multiparty politics in 1991, Kenya has had seven aggressive presidential elections. It was solely in 4 of them that important violence was witnessed; in all 4, the inevitably unpopular incumbent was operating. In 2002, 2013 and 2022, when no incumbent was on the poll, violence was comparatively muted, even the place the credibility of the election itself was contested.
The lesson is evident. It’s the efforts to enhance the credibility of the election and to implement institutional restraints on state actors which are the most effective safeguard.
Kenya has come a way on this regard because the conflagration that adopted the disputed 2007 election. The 2010 structure launched checks on the wanton train of state energy, most significantly an unbiased judiciary, which has confirmed a reputable venue for settling election disputes. Reforms to the election system to reinforce transparency, most evident within the 2022 elections, have additionally taken among the sting out of the polls.
Right now, nevertheless, that progress is in danger. And President William Ruto is operating for re-election.
Following a protracted delay, the Unbiased Electoral and Boundaries Fee (IEBC) was reconstituted in July final 12 months, albeit not with out controversy following the president’s initial decision to ignore a court order stopping the appointment of commissioners following a authorized problem to their suitability.
That stained the fee’s credibility from the very begin. The shambolic and violent by-elections for dozens of empty seats of senators and nationwide meeting members, which came about in November, additional broken public confidence within the fee as an unbiased referee. This wants pressing addressing.
However the credibility of the election is right down to extra than simply the IEBC. The Kenyan media has an particularly vital position to play. For years, out of concern of antagonising these in energy, main media homes have handled the announcement of vote tallies as an official operate finest left to electoral our bodies. That timidity has repeatedly undermined public confidence in election outcomes.
The 2022 election was a missed alternative. Even with polling-station outcomes publicly obtainable, Kenyan media appeared unable – or unwilling – to independently combination figures and clarify what the numbers had been saying in actual time. In 2027, the media can’t proceed to disregard its duties. There may be time to collaborate, rebuild capability and put money into information journalism. They need to put together to independently confirm outcomes and name the election, even when that makes energy uncomfortable.
Media weak point can also be more and more being exploited via on-line disinformation. And the instruments have gotten much more highly effective. Kenya is not any stranger to election manipulation within the digital age. It was one of many testing grounds for Cambridge Analytica, whose microtargeting operations throughout the 2013 election helped normalise data-driven psychological campaigning lengthy earlier than the scandal broke globally.
Right now, synthetic intelligence raises the stakes dramatically. AI-driven disinformation can flood platforms with artificial content material, fabricate audio and video, impersonate trusted voices, and goal communities with tailor-made narratives at pace and scale.
In environments the place belief in establishments is already skinny, disinformation doesn’t merely mislead. It could destabilise. It could delegitimise outcomes earlier than votes are solid, provoke panic or mobilisation primarily based on false claims, and supply justification for repression within the title of preserving public order. A robust, succesful, dependable and efficient media shall be essential in mitigating such impacts.
Regional and worldwide establishments and pressures have additionally been crucial in containing the violent appetites of Kenyan elites, however these are actually in decay. Right now’s international surroundings makes such restraint far much less doubtless. Throughout East Africa, governments are normalising repression as elections method. In neighbouring Tanzania and Uganda, authorities have acted with impunity to suppress dissent and election protests.
And this regional shift is happening alongside a broader collapse in international accountability. Western backing for Israel’s genocide in Gaza has accelerated the erosion of worldwide norms, undermined establishments such because the Worldwide Felony Court docket, and created a permissive surroundings for malevolent actors.
Given these circumstances, Kenya should deal with shoring up its inner defences. Time is operating out to insist on reforms to insulate unbiased state establishments from political interference. Although the Kriegler Fee, arrange within the aftermath of the 2007/8 election, really helpful that any adjustments to election guidelines ought to be concluded no less than two years earlier than the polls, we’re already previous that deadline.
Nonetheless, 2026 presents a possibility to rebuild the coalitions that may mobilise citizen motion as a bulwark in opposition to state repression. Within the Nineteen Nineties, these included civil society organisations, the church and the media.
The Gen Z protests confirmed that Kenyan youth can be a potent political power and it’s doubtless that we are going to see them out on the streets but once more this 12 months. The query is whether or not their elders will be part of them in standing up in opposition to state machinations.
Violence subsequent 12 months just isn’t inevitable. However stopping it requires pressing motion to guard the good points in electoral transparency and mobilise widespread motion as a protect in opposition to abuse of state energy.
The clock is ticking.
The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
