Seems even essentially the most delusional, far-left Hollywood darlings might be proper twice a day.
(Sure, I do know that adage applies to a damaged clock, however evaluating a busted timepiece to actress Jamie Lee Curtis is an insult to the damaged clock.)
Now, in full equity, maybe this author is being a bit harsh.
Positive, Curtis is completely bothered with Trump Derangement Syndrome, and sure, she overtly flaunts her baby affected by gender dysphoria.
However, to her infinitesimal credit score, regardless of the TDS and card-carrying membership within the LGBT mafia, Curtis is, in truth, an precise human being with a soul.
That won’t look like an particularly excessive bar to hurdle, however in case you’ve been paying any consideration to the leftist response to the current assassination of Turning Level USA founder Charlie Kirk, you understand that it’s a bar that swathes of America can’t appear to clear.
Nonetheless, Curtis did, and — once more, to her credit score — she did so by mentioning one of the vital issues to Kirk and his legacy: religion.
In line with Fox News, Curtis appeared on a podcast Monday and spoke about a variety of subjects. A kind of subjects included the just lately deceased Kirk.
And whereas many really feel the necessity to eulogize Kirk with a “however,” Curtis did no such factor.
She as an alternative overtly wept and broke down on the thought of a 31-year-old father and husband being violently killed in entrance of his spouse and children. You already know — a regular response to such a tragedy.
You may hear the related trade, courtesy of Trending Politics co-owner Collin Rugg, under:
Actress and movie producer Jamie Lee Curtis breaks down in tears over the demise of Charlie Kirk.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on nearly each level I ever heard him say…”
“However I consider he was a person of religion, and I hope in that second when he died, that he felt related to… pic.twitter.com/Bhv2UZrMhU
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 16, 2025
The bit (it’s not totally captured) begins with Curtis erroneously referring to Kirk as “Charlie Crist.”
“I’m sorry,” Curtis stated after being corrected by podcast host Marc Maron. “Kirk. I simply known as him Crist. I believe due to Christ. Due to his deep, deep perception.
“I imply, I disagreed with him on nearly each level I ever heard him say, however I consider he was a person of religion.”
It’s at this level that Curtis might barely include her feelings, as her voice quivered with sorrow as she continued to debate Kirk.
“And I hope in that second when he died, he felt related to his religion, though I discover what he … His concepts have been abhorrent to me, I nonetheless consider he was a father, a husband, and a person of religion, and I hope no matter connection to God means, that he felt it.”
Curtis would finally pivot to discussing 9/11 and the way People are simply always “bombarded” with harmful imagery, however her level — and response — to Kirk’s assassination was clear: No matter you might consider Charlie Kirk, on the very least, no person deserves to lose their life in the best way Kirk did.
Once more, credit score the place it’s due, Curtis’ response — “his concepts have been abhorrent” apart — is what many on the appropriate anticipated to see out of the left when Kirk was murdered in chilly blood.
As a substitute, we bought individuals actually dancing on his grave and making up quotes wholesale to denigrate a deceased man’s beliefs.
So I posit this to Ms. Curtis within the off probability she ever sees this: Check out your fellow leftists celebrating his demise. Check out your individual religion.
Is it actually Charlie Kirk’s biblical beliefs which might be “abhorrent”? Or is it the individuals with whom you encompass your self?
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
