Close Menu
    Trending
    • SHOCK: Washington, DC Mayor Muriel Bowser Quietly Working to Reverse ‘Sanctuary City’ Policy | The Gateway Pundit
    • Bill Belichick And Jordon Hudson Are ‘All About Each Other’ Despite Criticisms
    • US proposes 60-day ceasefire for Gaza, plan shows
    • South Korea set to break early voting record as presidential election looms | Elections News
    • Assessing the success, and failure, of the 2024-25 Premier League season
    • Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Respect and present all views
    • How to Build an Attractive Business for Potential Buyers
    • Empowering Drone Security with Embodied AI
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Latest News»Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News
    Latest News

    Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 10, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    In South Korea, as properly, historians say that Carter adopted the messaging of a army authorities going through human rights criticism.

    In Might 1980, a student-led pro-democracy rebellion within the South Korean metropolis of Gwangju was met with a brutal crackdown. In a single day, 60 individuals had been killed and a whole lot injured.

    Journalist Timothy Shorrock, who has been reporting on US-South Korea relations for many years, stated that the Carter administration was cautious of dropping a helpful Chilly Conflict ally and, subsequently, threw its weight behind the army authorities.

    He defined the US supported the South Korean management by releasing up army sources that allowed troops to place down the rebellion.

    “Understanding that [military leader General Chun Doo-hwan’s] forces had murdered 60 individuals the day earlier than, they nonetheless believed this rebellion was a nationwide safety menace to the US,” Shorrock stated of the Carter officers.

    Antigovernment protesters carrying South Korean flags sit behind a metropolis bus, used as a barricade in Gwangju on Might 27, 1980 [AP Photo]

    He added that when a US plane provider was despatched to the area, some protesters satisfied of US rhetoric on democracy and human rights believed that the US was coming to intervene on their behalf.

    As an alternative, the provider had been deployed to bolster the US army presence in order that South Korean troops on the demilitarised zone with North Korea may very well be reassigned to place down the rebellion.

    Shorrock says that contingency plans even included the attainable use of US forces if the unrest in Gwangju unfold additional.

    Whereas there isn’t any universally accepted loss of life toll for the rebellion, the official authorities determine is that greater than 160 individuals perished. Some tutorial sources put the loss of life toll at greater than 1,000.

    Requested by a reporter if his actions had been at odds together with his professed dedication to human rights, Carter stated that there was “no incompatibility”.

    He asserted that the US was serving to South Korea preserve its nationwide safety in opposition to a menace of “communist subversion”, mirroring the rhetoric of the nation’s army management.

    It was the type of rhetoric that South Korean leaders had lengthy used to justify repressive and antidemocratic measures.

    When South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law in December 2024 within the identify of combating “antistate forces”, many drew parallels to the traumatic occasions of Gwangju.

    “What he was saying on the time was what Basic Chun Doo-hwan was saying, characterising this as a communist rebellion, which it was not,” stated Shorrock. “He by no means apologised for that.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    South Korea set to break early voting record as presidential election looms | Elections News

    May 30, 2025

    Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,191 | Russia-Ukraine war News

    May 30, 2025

    Federal appeals court temporarily reinstates Trump tariffs | International Trade News

    May 30, 2025

    Why is Donald Trump cracking down on international students? | Education

    May 29, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    What is Systeme.io + how it works + my review (January 2024)

    December 30, 2024

    63-year-old wonders if she can retire with $100,000 debt

    February 12, 2025

    BREAKING: Democrat Rep. Gerry Connolly Dead at 75 | The Gateway Pundit

    May 21, 2025

    Hold the Chianti: Tariff Threat Leaves Italian Bottles Grounded

    March 29, 2025

    How To Come Back After A Layoff

    May 21, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.