Close Menu
    Trending
    • General Flynn Calls on DOJ to Confiscate Barack Obama’s Passport So He and His Minions Don’t Flee the Country from Prosecution (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Gwyneth Paltrow Was Secretly Stung By Brad Pitt’s Wedding To Jennifer Aniston
    • Commentary: What the world needs now is a universal ban on ‘forever chemicals’
    • Usyk knocks out Dubois in fifth to unify heavyweight boxing belts | Boxing News
    • Lakers beef up defense with key veteran addition
    • How to watch the 2025 WNBA All-Star Game between Team Caitlin Clark and Team Napheesa Collier
    • “This is the Biggest Crime in the History of the United States of America” – War Room’s Steve Bannon and General Flynn Discuss the Coup Against President Trump (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Jennifer Love Hewitt Talks Dealing With Body Scrutiny Early In Her Career
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Latest News»Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News
    Latest News

    Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 10, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Historians say Jimmy Carter’s human rights legacy includes grim failures | Human Rights News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    In South Korea, as properly, historians say that Carter adopted the messaging of a army authorities going through human rights criticism.

    In Might 1980, a student-led pro-democracy rebellion within the South Korean metropolis of Gwangju was met with a brutal crackdown. In a single day, 60 individuals had been killed and a whole lot injured.

    Journalist Timothy Shorrock, who has been reporting on US-South Korea relations for many years, stated that the Carter administration was cautious of dropping a helpful Chilly Conflict ally and, subsequently, threw its weight behind the army authorities.

    He defined the US supported the South Korean management by releasing up army sources that allowed troops to place down the rebellion.

    “Understanding that [military leader General Chun Doo-hwan’s] forces had murdered 60 individuals the day earlier than, they nonetheless believed this rebellion was a nationwide safety menace to the US,” Shorrock stated of the Carter officers.

    Antigovernment protesters carrying South Korean flags sit behind a metropolis bus, used as a barricade in Gwangju on Might 27, 1980 [AP Photo]

    He added that when a US plane provider was despatched to the area, some protesters satisfied of US rhetoric on democracy and human rights believed that the US was coming to intervene on their behalf.

    As an alternative, the provider had been deployed to bolster the US army presence in order that South Korean troops on the demilitarised zone with North Korea may very well be reassigned to place down the rebellion.

    Shorrock says that contingency plans even included the attainable use of US forces if the unrest in Gwangju unfold additional.

    Whereas there isn’t any universally accepted loss of life toll for the rebellion, the official authorities determine is that greater than 160 individuals perished. Some tutorial sources put the loss of life toll at greater than 1,000.

    Requested by a reporter if his actions had been at odds together with his professed dedication to human rights, Carter stated that there was “no incompatibility”.

    He asserted that the US was serving to South Korea preserve its nationwide safety in opposition to a menace of “communist subversion”, mirroring the rhetoric of the nation’s army management.

    It was the type of rhetoric that South Korean leaders had lengthy used to justify repressive and antidemocratic measures.

    When South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law in December 2024 within the identify of combating “antistate forces”, many drew parallels to the traumatic occasions of Gwangju.

    “What he was saying on the time was what Basic Chun Doo-hwan was saying, characterising this as a communist rebellion, which it was not,” stated Shorrock. “He by no means apologised for that.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Usyk knocks out Dubois in fifth to unify heavyweight boxing belts | Boxing News

    July 19, 2025

    Could Trump’s threats against Brazil backfire? | TV News

    July 19, 2025

    Dozens dead after tourist boat capsizes in Vietnam’s Halong Bay | Climate News

    July 19, 2025

    Protests held across UK supporting banned Palestine Action despite arrests | Protests News

    July 19, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Declining Enrollment Leaves 150 Chicago School Buildings Half Empty, Spending Tens of Thousands for Each Student | The Gateway Pundit

    June 19, 2025

    Argentina Evacuates WHO | Armstrong Economics

    February 7, 2025

    Liberal Media Drops Another Hit Piece on John Fetterman – It Looks Like the Left is Trying to Get Rid of Him | The Gateway Pundit

    May 9, 2025

    In Oct. 7 Report, Israeli Security Agency Puts Some Blame on Netanyahu Government

    March 5, 2025

    When soft drinks and snacks were medicine

    March 10, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.