Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Startups usually rush to file patents whereas their product remains to be taking form. The stress can come from investor expectations or the intuition to say a patent early. However I’ve seen too many founders spend $20,000 … $30,000 … defending concepts that by no means attain the market.
Being selective avoids that capital drain. A rushed submitting might really feel secure, but when product plans change or the market shifts, you’ve got locked in a value with little return.
After 25+ years of serving to startups defend what issues, I’ve developed a five-question filter to make smarter, extra strategic patent selections:
-
Does it remedy a technical downside with a technical answer?
-
Will it nonetheless matter to the enterprise in 2-20 years?
-
Can it develop into foundational and reusable throughout merchandise?
-
Does it supply market differentiators over rivals?
-
What are its possibilities of getting your application issued from the patent workplace?
This is tips on how to assume via these 5 questions.
Associated: The Basics of Protecting Your Intellectual Property, Explained
1. Is that this innovation fixing a technical downside with a technical answer?
To ease pushback from the patent office, your invention ought to remedy a technical downside with a technical answer. It should transcend summary concepts or human-centered processes to enhance how a system, services or products capabilities.
If it has benefits over identified options, for instance, environment friendly knowledge processing, improved mechanical reliability or strengthening a part’s construction, you are possible on stable floor. These variations have an effect on how a product performs, not simply what it does.
In distinction, improvements centered on managing human exercise, fixing enterprise issues or directing human effort are usually seen as enterprise strategies. The patent workplace applies a skeptical eye on these improvements such {that a} patent is unlikely.
Take this case: Your supply drone overheats on lengthy routes. You redesign the motor housing to enhance airflow and stop failure. That is a concrete technical answer to an actual technical downside and certain meets the primary take a look at for patent eligibility.
Subsequent, ask if it’ll nonetheless matter over time.
2. Will this innovation nonetheless matter to our Enterprise in two to twenty years from now?
Patents aren’t in a single day wins; most take two to a few years — typically longer — to grant. By the point one is permitted, will the concept nonetheless be related to your merchandise and the business?
Many startups file early with a way of urgency, however merchandise evolve, markets shift, and priorities change. That progressive characteristic customers love immediately could also be irrelevant subsequent yr.
That is why I at all times ask: Does this concept help your long-term enterprise targets? May it stay a part of your core providing even when your roadmap modifications?
If the reply is sure, the concept is price critical consideration. If not, it’s possible you’ll be higher off holding again your patent budget for the subsequent massive innovation.
Associated: 3.6 Million Patents Were Filed in 2023 Alone — This Is How the Most Successful Ones Got Approved
3. May this innovation develop into foundational to be reused throughout a number of product traces?
A number of the strongest patents I’ve seen aren’t tied to a single product. They remedy a technical downside that’s foundational to the platform underlying totally totally different product traces. As soon as issued, the patent strengthens the corporate’s basis.
That is what I imply by “foundational.” Perhaps it begins in your core product however later reveals up in a cell app, inner dashboard or enterprise model. Identical core functionality reused many times. In case your workforce retains discovering new methods to construct on it, it is possible price defending.
An excellent instance is Dyson‘s digital motor expertise. It began in vacuum cleaners, then powered bladeless followers, hand dryers and hair instruments. One patent household protected a core functionality reused throughout distinct product traces, making it elementary to the corporate’s development.
If an innovation has that form of scale, it is a robust patent candidate. Subsequent, take into consideration the way it would possibly offer you leverage out there.
4. Would this innovation give us leverage towards rivals?
One of many smartest issues you are able to do as a startup founder is research your rivals’ product technique. What are they submitting patents upon? What merchandise are they prioritizing? And extra importantly, what gaps are they lacking?
Submitting right into a soon-to-be-developed space can shift the facility dynamic. You could possibly safe a patent protecting a functionality they’re going to ultimately want, and now the trail they’re pursuing. That opens the door to licensing discussions, cross-licensing offers or defensive leverage when the competitors heats up.
As a result of in aggressive markets, patents aren’t simply authorized protections. They’re enterprise instruments. They create choices for partnerships, income or stress on the negotiating desk.
Nonetheless, even the best-positioned thought can fail not due to benefit however due to the place it lands within the patent workplace for examination. Your odds drop sharply in case your utility is assigned to a expertise space with a near-zero allowance fee.
That is why this ultimate query issues earlier than you file.
Associated: 5 Ways to Improve Your Chances of Getting Patents
5. What are the chances of success for this concept on the patent workplace?
Earlier than you file, know the way the concept is prone to carry out on the patent workplace. That perception is now obtainable lengthy earlier than a single declare is drafted.
Trendy predictor tools can now predict which USPTO artwork unit will deal with your utility with only a tough thought.
These items differ extensively in allowance charges, timelines and examiner habits. Understanding the place your utility is prone to be assigned provides you a strategic edge.
This turns into the ultimate filter in figuring out patent-worthy improvements.
Prioritize concepts prone to land in favorable teams. Drop those dealing with rejection-heavy examiners and drawn-out prosecution. Predictor instruments will help you refocus your declare course in a single that’s prone to see extra favorable consideration.
No startup can afford to chase patents that burn time and finances.
I strongly consider nice concepts earn safety not simply by being good however by standing as much as scrutiny from each angle.
That is what true vetting seems to be like. Engineers weigh feasibility. Enterprise groups assess strategic worth. IP counsel analyzes authorized power. When all these views align, robust patent selections emerge.
The 5 questions above are your shared framework. Answered throughout disciplines, they assist floor improvements well worth the time, value and safety.
Startups usually rush to file patents whereas their product remains to be taking form. The stress can come from investor expectations or the intuition to say a patent early. However I’ve seen too many founders spend $20,000 … $30,000 … defending concepts that by no means attain the market.
Being selective avoids that capital drain. A rushed submitting might really feel secure, but when product plans change or the market shifts, you’ve got locked in a value with little return.
After 25+ years of serving to startups defend what issues, I’ve developed a five-question filter to make smarter, extra strategic patent selections:
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be part of Entrepreneur+ immediately for entry.