Followers have closely criticized Tony Buzbee, the lawyer who represented Jay-Z‘s rape accuser after he was barred from practising in Southern New York District.
Buzbee reportedly did not ask for permission to follow within the district and was denied the request after doing so.
The current improvement places the lawyer’s lawsuits towards music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs within the district in query as he has filed over a dozen circumstances towards the latter.
Article continues beneath commercial
Tony Buzbee Denied Capacity To Apply In Southern New York District
His lawsuit towards Jay-Z is dismissed and never coming again, and now Tony Buzbee is attempting to make sure he can hold litigating his different lawsuits towards Diddy as a result of his admission software within the Southern District of New York was denied. pic.twitter.com/NuKOU7R38W
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) February 22, 2025
Buzbee suffered one other setback when his request for permission to follow within the Southern New York district was denied.
Authorized journalist Meghann Cuniff reported Buzbee’s incapability to follow within the district in a collection of posts she shared on X.
She shared a ruling from the Committee on Grievances dated February 13, 2025. The ruling learn, “The Committee on Grievances has thought-about Anthony G. Buzbee’s petition for admission to the USA District Court docket for the Southern District of New York (the “Petition”), which was filed on January 29, 2025.
It continued, “Per the Committee’s assessment of the dockets, Mr. Buzbee has appeared in circumstances on this courtroom with out looking for admission. Subsequently, the Petition is denied.”
Article continues beneath commercial
It concluded, “Within the occasion Mr. Buzbee strikes for professional hac vice or common admission on this Court docket sooner or later, he should connect a replica of this Order to his movement or petition.”
Article continues beneath commercial
Tony Buzbee’s Circumstances In opposition to Diddy At Danger
Within the put up’s caption, Cuniff wrote, “His lawsuit towards Jay-Z is dismissed and never coming again, and now Tony Buzbee is attempting to make sure he can hold litigating his different lawsuits towards Diddy as a result of his admission software within the Southern District of New York was denied.”
The ruling means Buzbee should embrace the letter of denial at any time when he requests permission to litigate in Southern New York.
In one other put up, Cuniff revealed the lawyer was attempting to take action for his different circumstances towards Diddy within the district.
She shared a snapshot of a movement he filed to litigate professional hac vice because the ruling stipulated and captioned it, “Because the order says, Buzbee can search “professional hac vice” admission, and that is what he is doing now within the Diddy lawsuits. Or attempting to at the very least.”
Article continues beneath commercial
Cuniff additionally shared paperwork from Candice McCrary’s lawsuit towards Diddy, wherein the choose discovered that Buzbee, the plaintiff’s legal professional, could not follow in Southern New York and requested him to file a movement to seem professional hac vice.
Article continues beneath commercial
Followers React To Tony Buzbee’s Lack of ability To Litigate In Southern New York
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/373e7/373e7d52f06a833968eaebf9fdb913aa4c93489f" alt="Tony Buzbee, the lawyer representing over 120 alleged Diddy victims"
A number of netizens reacted to Cuniff’s posts about Buzbee and took turns slamming the lawyer, who generated a lot buzz after representing the girl who accused Jay-Z and Diddy of raping her when she was 13.
One individual wrote, “Lol this lawyer actually underestimated Jay-Z.”
One other individual added, “Tony Buzbee is irresponsible & shady. He filed a case towards Jay-Z with out looking for admission within the Southern District of New York as a result of he is aware of he can’t be sanctioned by the courtroom with out one & was fully hoping Jay-Z would settle earlier than it will get far.”
A 3rd X consumer commented, “A real 1-800 lawyer. He put his different circumstances in jeopardy to go after a “huge fish” due to greed and Web disinformation.”
One other individual added, “right here it goesssss.. that lawyer is 100% soiled and searching for payouts.”
One other commenter urged these being represented by Buzbee to hunt different attorneys. They wrote, “Actual victims higher go search for one other lawyer now, any individual nonetheless retaining him is a liar and a fraud similar to he’s.”
Article continues beneath commercial
Buzbee Drops Case In opposition to Jay-Z And Diddy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48c7a/48c7ac111975608a3aafd0cbb60b545d51e9934d" alt="Fat Joe, Diddy, Jay Z"
Information of Buzbee’s incapability to follow in Southern NY comes per week after he voluntarily dismissed the sexual assault lawsuit he introduced towards Diddy and Jay-Z.
Within the lawsuit, which was filed in December, an unidentified lady claimed the rappers took turns raping her at an MTV Awards after-party in 2000.
After a number of back-and-forths between Buzbee and Jay-Z’s authorized group, led by Alex Spiro, the girl voluntarily dismissed the case with prejudice, which means it could’t be refiled in its present kind.
Jay-Z Reacts To Dropped Case
He wrote, “At present is a victory. The frivolous, fictitious, and appalling allegations have been dismissed. This civil go well with was with out benefit and by no means going anyplace. The fictional story they created was laughable, if not for the seriousness of the claims.”
Article continues beneath commercial
The “99 Issues” rapper mentioned he would not want his expertise on anybody and added, “The trauma that my spouse, my youngsters, family members and I’ve endured can by no means be dismissed. This 1-800 lawyer will get to file a go well with hiding behind Jane Doe, and once they shortly understand that the cash seize goes to fail, they get to stroll away with no repercussions.”
Jay-Z said, “The courtroom should shield victims, OF COURSE, whereas with the identical moral accountability, the courts should shield the harmless from being accused and not using a shred of proof. Might the reality prevail for all victims and people falsely accused equally.”