Close Menu
    Trending
    • Discord just dropped its first personalized year-in-review—and it looks a lot like Spotify Wrapped
    • Netizens React To Flowers 50 Cent Claims Diddy Sent Him
    • New York Times sues Perplexity AI for ‘illegal’ copying of content
    • British soldiers accused of more abuses in Kenya: What we know | Crime News
    • Jahmyr Gibbs hit Daron Bland with the nastiest ankle-breaker of the season
    • Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support
    • Netflix stock sinks as the streaming giant reveals plans to buy Warner Bros. and HBO in $83 billion mega-deal
    • Elon Musk’s X fined €120m over ‘deceptive’ blue ticks
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Tech News»OpenAI Questions Rationale of Elon Musk’s Bid to Control the Company
    Tech News

    OpenAI Questions Rationale of Elon Musk’s Bid to Control the Company

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseFebruary 12, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    OpenAI Questions Rationale of Elon Musk’s Bid to Control the Company
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    OpenAI’s board of administrators on Wednesday questioned the rationale of a $97.4 billion bid from Elon Musk and others to achieve management of the high-profile synthetic intelligence firm.

    On Monday, a consortium of buyers led by Mr. Musk offered to buy the property of the nonprofit that controls the corporate, escalating a yearslong feud between Mr. Musk and OpenAI’s chief government, Sam Altman.

    In a court docket submitting on Wednesday, the corporate stated Mr. Musk’s bid contradicted authorized claims the billionaire made in a lawsuit he introduced towards OpenAI final yr. OpenAI argued in its submitting that Mr. Musk stated in his lawsuit the property should stay with the nonprofit and couldn’t be transferred to a different entity for public achieve.

    The corporate is basically accusing Mr. Musk of hypocrisy. In his lawsuit, he argued OpenAI have to be ruled by the nonprofit. Now, OpenAI contends, he’s arguing the alternative.

    The OpenAI board has not but formally rejected the bid.

    Marc Toberoff, a Los Angeles lawyer who filed the lawsuit towards OpenAI on behalf of Mr. Musk, stated in an announcement to The New York Instances on Wednesday: “The lawsuit is just not about who controls OpenAI. It’s about Sam Altman and OpenAI’s misconduct.”

    If OpenAI’s board “is ready to stipulate to take the ‘For Sale’ log out the charity’s property in its so-called ‘conversion,’ Musk will withdraw his bid,” Mr. Toberoff added, referring to OpenAI’s efforts to sever itself from the nonprofit’s management. “However, in fact, OpenAI won’t ever do this.”

    The bid from Mr. Musk’s consortium might nonetheless complicate Mr. Altman’s efforts to separate the corporate from the nonprofit board and lift the billions of {dollars} that OpenAI must construct new applied sciences.

    For greater than a yr, Mr. Altman and his colleagues have been engaged on a plan to shift control of the company from the nonprofit to OpenAI’s buyers, together with Microsoft and the funding agency Thrive Capital.

    OpenAI has been negotiating a $40 billion fund-raising deal, led by the Japanese conglomerate SoftBank. The brand new fund-raising spherical values OpenAI at $300 billion, in line with three individuals with data of the deal who spoke on the situation of anonymity.

    The San Francisco firm’s uncommon company construction supplied a gap for Mr. Musk to meddle in that plan and make revamping OpenAI costlier.

    To be able to separate from the nonprofit board, Mr. Altman and his colleagues should present compensation. OpenAI would possibly pay the nonprofit a one-time payment, for example, or give it a minority stake within the firm.

    The nonprofit’s property, nonetheless, haven’t been given a worth. Mr. Musk is attempting to set one, and his provide might imply that OpenAI’s for-profit arm must spend extra to achieve independence from the outdated nonprofit.

    The clock is ticking for OpenAI to alter the way it operates. Below the phrases of OpenAI’s last investment round, it should shift management of the corporate away from the nonprofit in lower than two years. In any other case, its funding will convert into debt, in line with paperwork reviewed by The New York Instances.

    (The Instances has sued OpenAI and Microsoft, claiming copyright infringement of reports content material associated to A.I. techniques. The 2 firms have denied the swimsuit’s claims.)

    Mr. Musk’s aggressive transfer is the newest in a really private battle with Mr. Altman that began 10 years in the past as a partnership. They have been a part of the group that based OpenAI as a nonprofit in 2015, saying they needed to freely share their applied sciences with the world.

    When Mr. Musk left the group three years later after a battle for management, Mr. Altman connected OpenAI to a for-profit firm so he might increase the big quantities of cash wanted to construct A.I. applied sciences.

    In late 2023, the nonprofit board abruptly fired Mr. Altman, saying it not trusted him to construct A.I. for the good thing about humanity — which was one of many authentic rules of the nonprofit.

    He returned to the corporate in simply 5 days and commenced stacking the board together with his allies, whereas exploring methods of severing the nonprofit’s management. In the event that they severed the nonprofit’s management, Mr. Altman and his allies believed, OpenAI could be extra engaging to buyers.

    Earlier than the bid that grew to become public on Monday, Mr. Musk additionally moved to dam the adjustments to OpenAI’s administration construction with a lawsuit filed in federal court docket final yr.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Elon Musk’s X fined €120m over ‘deceptive’ blue ticks

    December 5, 2025

    At NeurIPS, Melanie Mitchell Says AI Needs Better Tests

    December 5, 2025

    BYD’s Ethanol Hybrid EV Is an Innovation for Brazil

    December 4, 2025

    Porn company fined £1m over inadequate age checks

    December 4, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Supersonic air travel gets green light in U.S. after 50-year ban lifted

    June 7, 2025

    School’s Out — How to Support Working Parents This Summer

    June 2, 2025

    Titans had shockingly bad stat line in Week 1 loss to Broncos

    September 8, 2025

    Trump Tries to Use White South Africans as Cautionary Tale

    March 15, 2025

    Trump Elevates Kremlin Talking Points, a Familiar Pattern From His First Term

    February 20, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.