Lady Gaga made it clear she’s firmly again in her theatrical period when she stormed the Grammy stage with a daring efficiency that left the viewers on its toes, and animal-rights activists fired up on-line. The 39-year-old pop icon delivered a rock-leaning reimagining of her hit single “Abracadabra,” ditching the complete troupe of dancers featured within the music video and as a substitute proudly owning the stage solo. Largely obscured beneath an elaborate, eye-like headpiece and dramatic feathered styling, Woman Gaga belted out the observe with uncooked depth. Because the efficiency wrapped, cameras captured the group rising to their toes in approval, however PETA was not a fan of Woman Gaga’s on-stage second.
Article continues under commercial
Woman Gaga’s Large Grammys Night time Comes With Backlash
Gaga entered the 2026 ceremony as one of many evening’s most embellished contenders. Already a 14-time Grammy winner, she earned seven nominations this 12 months, second solely to Kendrick Lamar, together with nods for Document of the 12 months, Album of the 12 months, Music of the 12 months, Finest Pop Solo Efficiency, Finest Pop Vocal Album, Finest Dance Pop Recording, and Finest Conventional Pop Album.
However whereas the efficiency wowed followers inside the sector, it additionally sparked backlash on-line.
Article continues under commercial
PETA Blasts Gaga’s Feathered Grammys Look
Shortly after Gaga’s look, PETA took intention at her feather-heavy look, posting a graphic that learn, “Woman Gaga, let birds hold their feathers,” alongside a message criticizing the usage of feathers in vogue. The group argued that feathers “belong on birds” and urged the look despatched the fallacious message, particularly throughout such a high-profile broadcast.
“I agree, particularly since she has a vegan make-up model,” one fan identified. “I want she’d truly be constant. And sure, I do know she used to put on a meat gown, however I might hope she’d evolve previous that.”
Others known as Gaga’s option to put on the gown “disappointing,” whereas one person expressed, “Cruelty doesn’t sound good on you!”
Article continues under commercial
Followers Defend Woman Gaga As They Query Whether or not Grammys Feathers Had been Even Actual
Not everybody agreed with PETA’s criticism, with many followers rapidly leaping to Woman Gaga’s protection and questioning whether or not the feathers utilized in her Grammys look had been actual in any respect.
A number of commenters identified that Gaga has publicly prevented sporting animal-derived vogue in recent times, suggesting the outrage could also be misplaced. “Is there proof that they’re actual?” one fan requested. “Gaga stopped sporting outfits comprised of animal origins years in the past. Plenty of her followers are animalists.”
Others echoed comparable doubts, questioning how anybody might decide the fabric primarily based on a single picture. “How are we certain it’s not fake feathers?” one particular person wrote, whereas one other added, “How does anybody know in the event that they’re actual or faux? That’s type of exhausting to inform simply from a photograph.”
Article continues under commercial
Gaga’s Trend Selections Have Lengthy Put Her At Odds With PETA
This isn’t the primary time Woman Gaga has discovered herself at odds with PETA over her vogue decisions.
Again in 2010, Gaga sparked large backlash when she hit the MTV Video Music Awards sporting her now-infamous meat gown, crafted completely from uncooked flank steak. The look immediately turned probably the most talked-about moments in awards-show historical past, and one among PETA’s most criticized.
On the time, the animal rights group condemned the outfit as “offensive,” arguing that the shock worth didn’t justify the message. “There are extra people who find themselves upset by butchery than who’re impressed by it,” PETA mentioned in response to the gown.
Article continues under commercial
Woman Gaga Beforehand Defended Her Controversial Meat Gown
After sporting the uncooked flank steak outfit to the 2010 MTV Video Music Awards, Gaga later defined her intent throughout a post-show interview with “The Ellen DeGeneres Present,” making it clear the look wasn’t meant as an assault on animal rights supporters. “It’s definitely no disrespect to anybody that’s vegan or vegetarian,” Gaga advised Ellen DeGeneres. “As , I’m essentially the most judgment-free human being on the Earth.”
She went on to clarify the symbolism behind the headline-making outfit, saying it carried a deeper message about standing up for private freedoms. “It has many interpretations, however for me this night it’s [saying], ‘If we don’t arise for what we consider in, if we don’t combat for our rights, fairly quickly we’re going to have as many rights because the meat on our bones.’”
On the finish of the day, followers know that Woman Gaga’s vogue has by no means been about taking part in it protected.
