Prince Harry & Meghan Praised For Giving ‘Life’ To Important Issues

A buddy of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has backed the royal couple as criticism over their life since they stepped again from their roles as senior royals persists.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have come underneath hearth for a wide range of causes since their exit in 2020.

Now, their shut pal, famend chef José Andrés, has slammed the hate they’ve acquired, saying Prince Harry and Meghan Markle use their platforms “to convey voice and life to points” somewhat than “dwelling in their very own cave.”

Talking with Page Six at Metropolis Harvest Presents the 2025 Gala: Carnaval in New York Metropolis, José Andrés expressed confusion over the fixed criticism focused at Prince Harry and Meghan since they stepped again from their royal duties and moved to the U.S.

He defended the duo, calling them an “superb couple” and noting that he solely desires to” discuss in regards to the good issues that they do.”

The chef then identified that the Sussexes may have chosen to be “in their very own cave and do nothing” after leaving royal life, however they’re utilizing their platforms “to convey voice and life to points.”

Giving context to his remarks, Andrés recalled how Harry and Meghan supplied help for the Los Angeles wildfires’ survivors.

“Once they have been in LA throughout the fires, they have been genuinely within the fires,” the non-profit ceo added. “When the cameras weren’t rolling, they have been there listening to individuals, they usually made them really feel like an important particular person on this planet.”

Among the latest backlash directed at Prince Harry and Meghan has come from Dr. Sophie Chandauka, the chair of Harry’s African charity, Sentebale.

Final month, following the Invictus Video games founder’s resignation from the group, Chandauka made headlines by labeling the couple’s model as “poisonous” in a bombshell interview.

“The primary danger for this organisation was the toxicity of its lead patron’s model,” Dr Chandauka, earlier than including that the couple stepping again from their royal life led to a decline within the charity’s donors and hampered its hiring skill.

“While you begin to interview individuals, they’re asking questions on, properly, these combined messages across the patron,” she added, per The Mirror.

The trustee chair had additionally beforehand accused Harry of bullying and misogyny, along with her claims and the group now being investigated by the Charity Fee.

One other particular person who has issued a string of criticisms towards Harry and Meghan is former Self-importance Honest editor-in-chief Tina Brown.

In a chat with The Telegraph, she claimed that the Duke and Duchess had a better constructive affect whereas working underneath the royal umbrella than by something they’ve accomplished since stepping away from the monarchy.

She mentioned, “He and Meghan discuss ‘doing good,’ however what good are they doing? The great you are able to do as a royal is a lot stronger.”

The veteran journalist then branded the couple as “catastrophe vacationers,” referencing their go to to survivors of the California wildfires.

She additionally claimed that the duo has a big “urge for food for cash,” which she believes led them to make “disastrous selections,” akin to Prince Harry’s “Spare” memoir and the Oprah interview.

Previously, Brown slammed Meghan over her cooking present, “With Love, Meghan,” and the previous actress’s strategy to selling her way of life model, As Ever.

Talking in regards to the present, Brown claimed it’s proof that Meghan has an “unerring intuition for getting it fallacious” and that she has “by no means discovered a convincing persona.”

She additionally used sharply worded remarks when referencing Meghan’s way of life model.