Close Menu
    Trending
    • Discord just dropped its first personalized year-in-review—and it looks a lot like Spotify Wrapped
    • Netizens React To Flowers 50 Cent Claims Diddy Sent Him
    • New York Times sues Perplexity AI for ‘illegal’ copying of content
    • British soldiers accused of more abuses in Kenya: What we know | Crime News
    • Jahmyr Gibbs hit Daron Bland with the nastiest ankle-breaker of the season
    • Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support
    • Netflix stock sinks as the streaming giant reveals plans to buy Warner Bros. and HBO in $83 billion mega-deal
    • Elon Musk’s X fined €120m over ‘deceptive’ blue ticks
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times
    Opinions

    Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 28, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Supreme Court: Federal judiciary | The Seattle Times
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Re: “This is not the time for Supreme Court to weaken federal judiciary” (Could 21, Opinion):

    Studying Erwin Chermerinsky’s column on the potential weakening of the federal judiciary introduced again to thoughts Colorado’s invoking of the 14th Modification to maintain President Donald Trump off the poll for participating in rebel.

    Now a case of a clearly unconstitutional govt order rescinding birthright citizenship for some has devolved into whether or not a regional federal decide’s opinion ought to maintain sway over the complete nation. Within the Colorado case, the query turned whether or not a state had the precise to disqualify a presidential candidate when it was the candidate who disqualified himself.

    Attorneys, and justices, delight themselves in going additional into the weeds than lay folks. Apparently for them, the query wouldn’t have been whether or not the emperor had no garments however whether or not the boy had standing to say so.

    Thomas Rogers, Vashon

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Trump’s peace plan for Gaza is on life support

    December 5, 2025

    Gift-giving: Meaningful alternative | The Seattle Times

    December 5, 2025

    Legislature: ‘How about spending less?’

    December 5, 2025

    MAGA turns on Costco after it sues Trump

    December 4, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The ‘2024-25 NBA points-per-game leaders’ quiz

    April 19, 2025

    Pope Leo’s Creole Roots Evoke Sense of Connection From Some Catholics of Color

    May 9, 2025

    Trump’s 10 percent tariff takes effect, raising fears of global trade war | Donald Trump News

    April 5, 2025

    The ‘NFL head coaches with multiple Super Bowl titles’ quiz

    February 9, 2025

    Report expands on Rodgers, Wilson conflict during 2024 season

    June 24, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.