On November 3, Vogue introduced that it’s folding its sister publication Teen Vogue into Vogue.com. Now, the web is mourning the lack of a uncommon publication that “took younger individuals critically.”
The information got here within the type of an article posted to Vogue’s enterprise vertical. Per the submit, the transition is “a part of a broader push to increase the Vogue ecosystem.”
The article goes on to elucidate that Teen Vogue “will stay a definite editorial property, with its personal identification and mission,” and that the publication will “focus its content material on profession improvement, cultural management, and different points that matter most to younger individuals.”
Additional, it notes that Teen Vogue editor-in-chief Versha Sharma shall be leaving the corporate, whereas Vogue’s head of editorial content material, Chloe Malle, will step in to supervise the sister publication.
Within the wake of Vogue’s announcement, Condé Nast laid off a number of of Teen Vogue‘s staffers, reportedly together with a majority of its BIPOC and trans staff. Now, Teen Vogue’s former editors and writers, and plenty of of its present followers, are taking to the web to mourn the loss and criticize the journal large that owns it.
Right here’s what to know.
What occurred to Teen Vogue?
Whereas Vogue is framing the absorption of Teen Vogue as a method to supply “a extra unified reader expertise,” members of Condé United, a union that represents staff throughout Condé Nast’s journal manufacturers, name the transfer “clearly designed to blunt the award-winning journal’s insightful journalism at a time when it’s wanted probably the most.”
In a post to X, the union mentioned: “Administration plans to put off six of our members, most of whom are BIPOC or trans, together with Teen Vogue’s Politics Editor.” The assertion added: “Teen Vogue now has no writers or editors explicitly protecting politics.”
In an announcement to Quick Firm, a Condé Nast spokesperson mentioned: “Teen Vogue has confronted ongoing challenges round scale and viewers attain for a while. Quite than persevering with to function independently with restricted attain, bringing Teen Vogue beneath the Vogue umbrella permits it to faucet into a bigger viewers, stronger distribution, and extra sources.”
Neither Vogue nor Condé Nast immediately responded to questions on whether or not the layoffs primarily impacted BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and folks of shade) and trans staffers and what number of staff had been let go in whole.
Teen Vogue’s strong political reporting beforehand earned the publication a number of main awards, together with the April Sidney Award for social justice coverage in 2018 and the Roosevelt Institute’s Freedom of Speech Medal in 2025.
In a statement published on November 3, the Roosevelt Institute referred to as Vogue’s resolution to include Teen Vogue “proof that company focus eliminates modern concepts and silences voices with much less energy.”
Followers react to the information
Followers of Teen Vogue—which was first revealed in 2003—are taking to the web in droves to specific their unhappiness that one of many solely main publications geared towards teenagers (and primarily teen ladies) will now not keep an unbiased presence.
“Teen Vogue took younger individuals critically. It’s not possible to overstate how essential, how uncommon, and the way profoundly wanted that’s,” one tweet from author Rainesford Stauffer reads.
“[Depressed] on the Teen Vogue information,” wrote another X user. “There’s going to be nothing left for youth/teenagers to succeed in for when they’re interested by information and points, whether or not it’s about style or politics or popular culture.”
Readers are most involved by the obvious gutting of Teen Vogue staffers who centered on identification and politics protection, particularly throughout a second when conservative messaging has develop into extra frequent in media and ideas like variety, fairness, and inclusion (DEI) are beneath assault.
In one TikTok explainer with greater than 12,000 likes, creator @nya.etienne describes the overhaul as “an intentional silencing of underrepresented voices.”
“[They] laid off nearly all of their BIPOC and trans workers, and this must be an enormous concern for everyone that cares about free press in media,” she says within the video. “Teen Vogue is {a magazine} that taught a era of us tips on how to assume critically.”
Former staffers take to social media
Teen Vogue’s former writers, editors, and staffers are additionally taking to social media to specific alarm on the sudden change.
Aiyana Ishmael, the publication’s former fashion editor, shared on Bluesky that she has been laid off—including that, within the wake of the layoffs, there aren’t any Black staffers remaining on the publication.
“At [the Teen Vogue Summit], I used to be requested the way it felt to be 1 of two Black ladies left and what that meant for illustration,” she wrote. “Now, there aren’t any Black ladies at Teen Vogue, and that’s extremely painful to consider.”
Teen Vogue’s most up-to-date politics editor, Lex McMenamin, was additionally laid off this week: “Actually extra to return from me when the mud has settled extra, however to my information, after immediately, there shall be no politics staffers at Teen Vogue,” they wrote on Bluesky on November 3.
In a lengthy blog written for the publication Speaking Factors Memo (TPM), Allegra Kirkland, who served as Teen Vogue’s politics director for six years till June 2025, condemned Condé Nast’s resolution.
She advised Quick Firm that the publication served as a spot for younger individuals—particularly younger ladies and LGBTQ+ individuals—to place themselves “on the entrance traces of the combat in opposition to Trumpism,” advocating for points “from the atrocious struggle on Gaza to ebook bans and gun violence in faculties.”
Now, Kirkland says, that platform is gone.
“The mainstream media too typically disregards younger individuals’s opinions, or condescends to them of their protection,” she says. “They’re smeared as woke scolds, checked-out TikTok addicts, or youngsters who’re too naive to have totally shaped opinions about politics.”
She famous mainstream journalism’s tendency to jot down about sure subjects from the skin, citing “feature-length articles” about transgender youth that didn’t embody a single quoted supply from throughout the group itself. “Teen Vogue’s protection tried to supply a counter to that—to let younger individuals communicate for themselves,” she says.
Kirkland factors to Teen Vogue’s protection of gender-affirming care for trans youth, staff’ rights, and organizing safely beneath the Trump administration as just some ways in which the publication served essential info to its readers.
Her former colleagues at the moment are pushing Condé Nast to protect Teen Vogue’s archives in order that these sources aren’t misplaced. The journal’s print version folded in 2017, with The New York Instances reporting 80 job cuts on the time.
To assist former Teen Vogue staffers within the wake of the information, McMenamin has organized a fundraiser on GoFundMe that’s devoted to protecting “hire and utilities, medical payments, automotive funds, relocation bills, main purchases like private computer systems with a purpose to work, and different requirements” for impacted staff.
“Condé Nast killed a beloved publication that meant a lot to generations of younger writers and readers, particularly these from marginalized backgrounds,” Kirkland says. “They did so throughout an oppressive, authoritarian presidential administration that’s trampling on the rights of these younger individuals and on the First Modification. It’s a rattling disgrace.”
