Close Menu
    Trending
    • Sudan once again tops International Rescue Committee crises watchlist
    • ‘New world disorder’: Sudan, Palestine top IRC’s 2026 Emergency Watchlist | Humanitarian Crises News
    • Parsons’ season-ending injury puts microscope on Packers HC
    • ICE is spending millions on ads to recruit new agents
    • Virtual Power Plants Face New Grid Test
    • US Homeland Security Rescues 62,000 Unaccompanied Minors From Trafficking
    • Lori Loughlin Makes Career Comeback Announcement
    • Bondi Beach shooting: New footage shows couple confronting gunman
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»The Netflix, Warner Bros., Paramount, Trump saga: A sign of the regulatory apocalypse
    Opinions

    The Netflix, Warner Bros., Paramount, Trump saga: A sign of the regulatory apocalypse

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseDecember 14, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Netflix, Warner Bros., Paramount, Trump saga: A sign of the regulatory apocalypse
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The confluence of two seemingly unrelated information occasions in latest days — the primary one roiling Hollywood and media from coast to coast, the opposite enjoying out earlier than the Supreme Court docket — was nothing wanting uncanny.

    And disturbing.

    The first information was the one-two punch of the Dec. 5 bombshell that Netflix deliberate to swallow up Warner Bros. Discovery’s studio and streaming enterprise to create an leisure business behemoth, after which Monday’s competing hostile bid from jilted suitor Paramount Skydance for all of Warner. And in between, final Sunday, President Donald Trump — tuxedoed and talking on a pink carpet, appropriately sufficient — proclaimed matter-of-factly, “I’ll be concerned” in deciding the winner. (Simply as he’d decided who gained that night time’s annual Kennedy Heart Honors, after firing the middle’s bipartisan board and making himself chairman and host.)

    As if anybody doubted that Trump could be the de facto decider right here. Definitely Netflix co-Chief Govt Ted Sarandos and Paramount CEO David Ellison didn’t doubt. The warring rivals every have been courting Trump’s favor, simply as he likes — and as different company chieftains have discovered to do within the suck-up, pay-to-play world Trump has constructed from his gilded White Home. Ellison even sat within the Kennedy Heart’s presidential field with Trump, hours earlier than asserting Paramount’s flex (with Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner as an investor), and Trump confirmed from the pink carpet that he and Sarandos just lately met within the White Home as Sarandos weighed Netflix’s shock bid.

    Enjoying with the supposed titans like a cat with mice, Trump coupled reward of Sarandos with concern about Netflix’s already big market share, and tempered his Sunday coziness with Ellison by lambasting Ellison’s Paramount in an unhinged social media post on Monday as a result of one in all its properties, CBS, put Trump disciple-turned-detractor Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia on “60 Minutes.” (Individually, Ellison reportedly assured Trump that ought to Paramount win, it might make adjustments at CNN, a Warner property that’s a frequent Trump punching bag.)

    “None of them are significantly nice associates of mine,” Trump teased to reporters on Monday. As if that ought to matter.

    The president likes to maintain individuals guessing, preserve ’em courting. He additionally likes to construct slightly actuality present suspense: Everyone seems to be competing to be his apprentice.

    “In Warner Combat, a Hollywood Plot That Makes Trump the Star” was the headline in The Wall Road Journal on Tuesday.

    Such overt shows of presidential power-grabbing and company supplication would have been mini-scandals, as a minimum, in previous occasions. Presidents of each events knew that, by regulation and custom, judgments about such megamergers must be left to the antitrust attorneys, economists and regulators throughout the Justice Division and on the applicable impartial federal company. That was exactly to defend in opposition to politics and presidential whims polluting the method of constructing advanced, consequential, market-moving choices.

    But at the same time as Trump was busting extra norms within the warfare over Warners, within the different information of previous days, the right-wing supermajority on the Supreme Court docket signaled loud and clear that it’s about to additional empower presidents to intrude politically in American enterprises, and to undermine Congress and the remainder of authorities.

    The conservative justices’ feedback got here in oral arguments on Monday in a case difficult Trump’s firing of a Democratic appointee on the Federal Commerce Fee — one in all many such unlawful firings since he retook energy — for violating the statutory independence of federal companies. The justices took Trump’s aspect. Their hostility to regulatory companies, and their zeal to strike down the unanimous 90-year-old court docket precedent that protects the companies’ independence, has been well-known.

    For years it’s been a fever dream on the appropriate to neuter the so-called administrative state (the deep state, in MAGA-speak). The truth is, throughout Trump’s first time period, what beneficial Brett M. Kavanaugh, Neil M. Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett to White Home vetters (and the Senate’s Republican majority) was much less their anti-abortion cred than their confirmed animus towards the executive state and the 1935 ruling, Humphrey’s Executor, that gave rise to it.

    The conservatives’ assist for permitting presidents to fireside impartial authorities officers with out trigger might have an effect on not solely what TV reveals and movies People see, but in addition the protection of the meals, water and medicines they eat, the monetary merchandise they purchase, the information they get and far more.

    The court docket would primarily bless what Trump is already doing: selecting winners and losers in enterprise, science, media and different non-public sectors — precisely what Republicans have lengthy railed in opposition to. Till now.

    What an unlucky coincidence of historical past that we’re saddled with a Supreme Court dedicated to expanding presidential power at a time when we’ve a president who fancies himself an all-powerful king (and a Republican-controlled Congress that also won’t check him).

    The Warner struggle, and the spectacle of Trump overtly taking possession of the end result, is a preview of the federal government to return, assuming the court docket guidelines as anticipated by summer season. All however gone would be the system constructed over a century, by which Congress created impartial, bipartisan and professional companies to fill in advanced particulars for the payments legislators handed and to see to it that these legal guidelines have been adopted. Company directors by regulation embrace each Democrats and Republicans serving fastened phrases, to insulate in opposition to one-sided politics.

    “Having a president are available in and hearth all of the scientists and the medical doctors and the economists and the Ph.D.s, and changing them with loyalists and individuals who don’t know something, is definitely not in the very best curiosity of the residents of the US,” liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor said throughout Monday’s arguments.

    An impartial, bipartisan Congress might attempt to take again its powers, together with by new legal guidelines. However we don’t have that. What we’ve is a clownish president with an excessive amount of energy, who wears a hat emblazoned “Trump was right about everything” and really believes it. And that man will get much more energy? If solely it have been only a dangerous film.

    Jackie Calmes: is an opinion columnist for the Los Angeles Instances in Washington, D.C.

    ©2025 Los Angeles Instances. Go to at latimes.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Hanukkah attack: A path forward

    December 16, 2025

    Financial literacy in WA schools should be elementary

    December 15, 2025

    The Kent Valley: Region’s aerospace powerhouse is poised to blast off

    December 15, 2025

    Shocking new National Security Strategy deserves Americans’ attention

    December 15, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    What are the rules for electric scooters in London? British backpacker jailed after deadly crash

    December 12, 2025

    Violence Sweeps Coastal Syria, Sowing Chaos: ‘We Have to Get Out of Here’

    March 9, 2025

    France can and must do more than recognising Palestinian statehood | Israel-Palestine conflict

    April 13, 2025

    Trevor Lawrence makes big admission about game-winning play

    October 7, 2025

    Epstein alleged Trump ‘knew about the girls’: Democrats

    November 12, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.