Close Menu
    Trending
    • ICE Chief Says Agency is Going to Crack Down on Companies Employing Illegal Aliens (WATCH) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Country Singer Morgan Wallen Pokes Fun At Astronomer CEO During Concert
    • Israeli fire kills 67 people seeking aid in Gaza, medics say, as hunger worsens
    • Why are so many Palestinian religious sites under attack by Israel? | Israel-Palestine conflict
    • Nuggets provide positive update on Jonas Valanciunas saga
    • Metabolizing into art the year America cracked up
    • AI isn’t coming for your job—it’s coming for your whole org chart 
    • The Western worker disappears: how hyperregulation and globalism united communism and liberalism.
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»U.S. Senate should strike AI regulation ban from budget bill
    Opinions

    U.S. Senate should strike AI regulation ban from budget bill

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJune 24, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    U.S. Senate should strike AI regulation ban from budget bill
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Within the present nationwide political local weather, bipartisanship is extraordinarily uncommon, particularly relating to necessary subjects comparable to states’ rights and regulating using synthetic intelligence.

    Nevertheless it was precisely such laws that introduced U.S. Sens. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., and Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee, collectively.

    Simply as time winds down for a closing vote, Senate Republicans tucked contained in the tax and funds invoice President Donald Trump calls “huge and exquisite” a provision that will ban states from implementing any legal guidelines their state legislatures could have handed that regulate synthetic intelligence.

    Washington and Tennessee are amongst 40 states, together with different crimson states comparable to Arkansas and Louisiana, whose attorneys general have voiced opposition to the availability that seeks to undo a number of what their workplaces have performed.

    Tennessee’s lawyer basic joined Washington AG Nick Brown in opposition to the ban on AI guidelines enforcement.

    “On the tempo know-how and AI strikes, limiting state legal guidelines and laws for 10 years is harmful,” Brown stated. “If the federal authorities is taking a again seat on AI, they need to not prohibit states from defending our residents.”

    Washington has been within the forefront relating to defending customers, kids and the general public typically from dangerous actors within the AI sector.

    In 2023 the state Legislature passed a law that requires political campaigns to reveal when media content material or advertisements that depict a candidate have been altered utilizing AI. It created a law in 2024 to make it a criminal offense to create, possess or distribute fabricated intimate pictures of minors engaged in sexual acts. And this 12 months, it handed a law that makes it illegal to purposefully distribute a “solid digital likeness” of one other individual’s picture or voice for the aim of deception.

    “Corporations shouldn’t need us to attend till one thing actually dangerous occurs, till somebody dies due to a scarcity of AI regulation,” stated state Rep. Cindy Ryu, D-Shoreline, who sponsored the digital likeness invoice and serves on the AI job drive for the Nationwide Council of State Legislators.

    To tighten the principles much more, the proposed provision, which was added to the reconciliation invoice, would make entry to funding from the Broadband Equity Access and Development program contingent on compliance with the 10-year moratorium. Washington was allotted $1.2 billion from this system to supply higher entry for the 214,000 Washington residents who’ve insufficient broadband.

    States have an obligation to guard residents and their identities in an trade that’s creating quickly. That may take unity and elevated stress on the Senate Republicans.

    The Seattle Occasions editorial board: members are editorial web page editor Kate Riley, Frank A. Blethen, Melissa Davis, Josh Farley, Alex Fryer, Claudia Rowe, Carlton Winfrey and William Ok. Blethen (emeritus).



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Metabolizing into art the year America cracked up

    July 20, 2025

    Pausing state timber sales is taking a toll on schools, local governments

    July 19, 2025

    Reclaiming motherhood in America | The Seattle Times

    July 19, 2025

    To rebuild trust in local news, start with civic habits, not political labels

    July 19, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Sydney Sweeney Opens Up About Living In A Hotel During Financial Struggles

    June 2, 2025

    Comic Con: ‘It’s not escape. It’s engagement.’

    March 18, 2025

    Trump nominee Pam Bondi vows independence; won’t rule out probes of Trump critics

    January 15, 2025

    I Sold My Company for Nine Figures. Here Are 3 Hard Lessons That Got Me There

    May 19, 2025

    Poised to Expand Gaza Offensive, Israel Calls Up Thousands of Reserve Soldiers

    May 3, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.