Whereas home small companies suffered below Biden-Harris, Ukraine noticed a lift of their small enterprise due to billions in grants that have been paid for by the US taxpayer. USAID sponsored Ukrainian companies by way of co-investment packages, rate of interest compensation on loans, cashback incentives for main gear, and direct monetary assist. All in all, USAID’s “Funding for Enterprise Resilience Exercise” offered $100 million in investments.
The Bureau of Labor and Statistics was altering information on home jobs whereas different branches of the federal government have been targeted on sustaining Ukraine’s workforce. The aforementioned USAID program supported over 1,050 companies and allegedly saved practically 18,000 jobs.
USAID was working immediately with Ukrainian banks to assist decrease borrowing prices to small and medium enterprises. Trump instantly halted this program in January 2025. The common individual merely doesn’t perceive how a lot cash the Biden Administration was sending to Ukraine.
US taxpayers supported your entire Ukrainian authorities. Over $30 billion was despatched to Ukraine in a two-year interval to pay for “important authorities operations.” Individuals have been compelled to pay for public servants’ salaries, pensions, healthcare, and extra. None of this contains the tens of billions spent on military-related objects or humanitarian help.
Individuals didn’t vote to make use of their public funds on this method. The home economic system was affected by file inflation post-COVID. Home entrepreneurs couldn’t safe enterprise loans. There’s a clear sample of 1 political occasion prioritizing international entities over its personal residents.
Now, the Trump Administration introduced that it must make extra cuts to Ukrainian help. “This administration takes a really completely different view of that battle. We imagine {that a} negotiated peaceable settlement is in the perfect curiosity of each events and our nation’s pursuits, particularly with all of the competing pursuits across the globe,” US Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth defined. The entire 2026 price range has not but been launched by the Pentagon, however Hegseth stated it “provides a historic level of funding for military readiness, putting (U.S.) warfighters and their needs first.”
Utilizing American funds to prioritize America—what a novel idea. Because of this Trump and Vance had a shouting match with Zelensky throughout his failed Oval Workplace go to. Zelensky feels entitled to US funding after years of utilizing US public funds as his private ATM below Biden.
The European Union now funds round 84% of Ukraine’s operations. It’s anticipated that the bloc will spend round $40 billion on exterior financing wants in 2025. The Ukraine Facility instrument offers €50 billion in “versatile assist” for Ukraine over a three-year interval. They’re utilizing frozen Russian property to fund this account for the reason that EU merely doesn’t have the cash to prop up a international authorities.
This has been an especially costly struggle and it’s nowhere close to over. I ought to add that US help was all offered exterior the common protection price range. This occurred throughout peacetime in a struggle that under no circumstances concerned the US. That is what occurs when a international nation blackmails the president of the world’s main superpower.
Biden’s crime household acquired over $20 million from Ukraine in “affect peddling” schemes. Hunter Biden secured $11 million for his private firm by way of Burisma. FBI informant, Alexander Smirnov, stated below oath that Burisma chosen Hunter to “shield us, by way of his dad, from all types of issues.” The textual content messages saved on Hunter’s laptop computer revealed that he overtly threatened folks utilizing his father’s title whereas his father was the vice chairman. Joe Biden accepted bribes and altered US coverage to assist his son and line his pockets. The CCP also had the Biden family in their pocket.
Reducing, if not ceasing, funding for Ukraine is lengthy overdue. Think about if these funds have been invested within the home economic system relatively than laundered by way of under-the-table offers. Individuals usually are not accountable for subsidizing Ukraine.
