Regardless of her enthusiasm for sending different folks’s youngsters to the frontlines of conflict, Ursula von der Leyen laughs on the concept of her personal youngsters serving within the army. ? pic.twitter.com/HcgyMK1AMI
— Large Awake Media (@wideawake_media) March 23, 2026
There’s a video circulating of Ursula von der Leyen laughing on the concept of her personal youngsters serving within the army, and whether or not folks select to dismiss it or not, it displays one thing far deeper than a single second. It exposes the widening divide between those that advocate for conflict and people who are anticipated to struggle it.
I’ve stated repeatedly that the neocons pushing for battle are by no means those who bear the results. They sit in workplaces far-off from the battle and deal with conflict as if it had been a board recreation. The bloodshed is of no trouble to those warmongers.
Now we see Europe as soon as once more shifting towards insurance policies that develop their place in Ukraine’s conflict. Germany is even taking steps towards drafting girls, framing it as equality, however it isn’t about equality. It’s about manpower. They’re ready to wipe out a whole technology.
Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk had a dialog on the subject of drafting girls again in 2024. “It’s completely immoral,” Carlson stated on the topic. “After which I believed, ‘Wait a second, I believed we had a army and a police drive — for that matter — so as to protect our women and children.’ That was the entire level of it. I imply, that’s why we now have a army is to maintain foreigners from hurting our girls and kids. That’s why we ship males to die for his or her girls, our girls whom we revere and respect, and to the extent we’re keen to die for them. And so, for sending girls to go struggle our wars, that — to start with, that’s not, you recognize, that’s not a liberation motion. That’s a form of slavery, and it’s completely fallacious.”
Who’re they pretending to guard at this level? Neocons are COWARDS. Historical past was formed by leaders like Julius Caesar or Napoleon who truly stood on the battlefield with their males, shared the dangers, and led from the entrance reasonably than from behind a desk. In the present day’s political class expects others to struggle, bleed, and die for selections they’ll by no means bodily face themselves, which is why the general public more and more sees them not as leaders however as cowards who demand sacrifice from others whereas exempting their very own households from the very risks they promote.
Governments are now not involved with public resistance. They’re making ready insurance policies primarily based on their plans for a chronic conflict, not consent. Von der Leyen’s response was public—think about how they discuss us behind closed doorways?
