Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
After Bitcoin launched in 2009, it turned clear to proponents that it might have a tough time ever turning into “digital money.” It was too sluggish and decentralized. As an alternative, the consensus was reached that its goal ought to match its structure. The pivot was essential: Bitcoin aimed to be a decentralized store of value — a digital vault. It wasn’t constructed for velocity, and as a retailer of worth, it might by no means want to be quick.
Ten-minute block instances had been acceptable as a result of they did not have to be used for each day funds, not to mention real-time gaming or algorithmic buying and selling. It would not need to compete with Visa or PayPal; it merely needed to function a hedge in opposition to macroeconomic and geopolitical dangers, like its gold and uncommon metallic counterparts.
As such, its restricted throughput was reframed as a characteristic fairly than a flaw, a safety trade-off that prioritized immutability and decentralization over immediate comfort.
In some ways, Bitcoin turned a philosophical assertion in regards to the trade-offs inherent in trustless techniques, educating the business that decentralization has prices, however these prices outline its distinctive worth proposition.
Associated: America Needs a Bitcoin Reserve — Here’s Why
The blockchain house has developed far past its origins, and no different chain can try to recreate Bitcoin’s narrative. In 2025, Web3 is now not about theoretical use cases. It’s powering precise economies, which depend on quick finality and battle-tested safety. Tokenized property, funds apps, decentralized finance, shopper loyalty, identification, gaming and increasingly AI systems all depend on the identical basis: scalable, low-latency infrastructure.
These real-world purposes demand efficiency that was inconceivable within the early days of cryptocurrency. The promise of decentralized expertise can now not exist solely as an idea; it should function on the velocity, scale and reliability that fashionable customers have come to anticipate.
However that basis is nowhere close to the place it must be. Right now’s blockchains are requested to carry out like global-scale platforms, at the same time as most nonetheless battle with Nineteen Nineties-era throughput. That mismatch is the most important risk to Web3’s future, the space between what’s demanded of a decentralized blockchain and what these protocols can truly provide.
Most chains in the present day nonetheless course of fewer than 100 transactions per second. Legacy networks like Visa can deal with tens of 1000’s with out breaking a sweat. Excessive-frequency buying and selling platforms function with microsecond latency. And but we anticipate builders, enterprises and customers to construct and transact on infrastructure that is slower than dial-up.
Associated: Why Gold and Bitcoin Are the Go-To Safe Havens in 2025
The general public won’t look ahead to us to catch up. They’re used to seamless, real-time experiences. Something much less feels damaged. This isn’t a matter of optimization. It’s a query of survival. If we don’t construct for efficiency, we won’t be taken critically. Web3 can’t survive on nostalgia or theoretical beliefs alone; it wants infrastructure able to dealing with the realities of billions of customers, every anticipating immediate outcomes, frictionless interaction and monetary safety always.
What Web3 wants now could be a clear break from legacy limitations. The following technology of chains should be constructed for velocity from day one. This consists of superior sequencing architectures that permit networks to prioritize and order transactions effectively. It additionally consists of parallelized execution, which permits blockchains to course of 1000’s of transactions concurrently, fairly than one after one other, in a single line. On high of that, builders want predictable price constructions that make sense at scale. Micropayments do not work when charges are greater than the transaction itself. With out these foundational adjustments, innovation will stay bottlenecked and adoption will stall.
None of that is elective anymore; If we would like blockchain expertise to serve billions of customers, we want infrastructure that performs like international monetary rails. Which means sub-second latency. It means tens of 1000’s of transactions per second. It means prices that make sense for on a regular basis use.
A few of that is already underway. A number of high-throughput chains are being examined proper now, and some are in manufacturing. Polygon PoS is predicted to cross 5,000 transactions per second this 12 months. Inside the subsequent twelve to eighteen months, 100,000 TPS is inside attain. At that time, Web3 can start to noticeably problem legacy platforms.
Plus, with the facility of ZK expertise, we are able to now have institution-grade blockchains that may present 10s of 1000’s of TPS with full management and compliance accessible to the corresponding establishment. Zero-knowledge proofs permit for privacy-preserving verification and regulatory compliance concurrently, making it potential for establishments to leverage public blockchains with out compromising safety or governance necessities.
Associated: I Studied 233 Millionaires — These Are the 6 Habits That Made Them Rich
However we will not afford to have fun incremental enhancements. Pace is not only a technical achievement. It’s what unlocks the real-world purposes we now have been promising for over a decade. With out it, we keep caught within the prototype part.
The following technology of the web will not look ahead to us. It should transfer ahead with or with out blockchains at its core. If Web3 desires to be a part of that future, it should begin constructing prefer it.
Now.
After Bitcoin launched in 2009, it turned clear to proponents that it might have a tough time ever turning into “digital money.” It was too sluggish and decentralized. As an alternative, the consensus was reached that its goal ought to match its structure. The pivot was essential: Bitcoin aimed to be a decentralized store of value — a digital vault. It wasn’t constructed for velocity, and as a retailer of worth, it might by no means want to be quick.
Ten-minute block instances had been acceptable as a result of they did not have to be used for each day funds, not to mention real-time gaming or algorithmic buying and selling. It would not need to compete with Visa or PayPal; it merely needed to function a hedge in opposition to macroeconomic and geopolitical dangers, like its gold and uncommon metallic counterparts.
As such, its restricted throughput was reframed as a characteristic fairly than a flaw, a safety trade-off that prioritized immutability and decentralization over immediate comfort.
In some ways, Bitcoin turned a philosophical assertion in regards to the trade-offs inherent in trustless techniques, educating the business that decentralization has prices, however these prices outline its distinctive worth proposition.
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be a part of Entrepreneur+ in the present day for entry.

