Close Menu
    Trending
    • Passengers Use Emergency Slide to Evacuate After Landing Gear of American Airlines Plane Catches Fire at Denver Airport (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Justin Timberlake Reportedly ‘In A Rut’ Amid ‘Sub-Par’ Tour Performances
    • UNRWA chief says Gaza aid airdrops will not stop ‘starvation’
    • De Ridder beats Whittaker in middleweight fight at UFC Abu Dhabi | Mixed Martial Arts News
    • Texans have potential backfield concerns after Joe Mixon injury update
    • What Does POS Experience Mean?
    • Report: Team Hegseth Ordered to Stop Using Polygraph Tests in Search of Leaks to Media Following Complaint from a Senior Adviser – Pentagon Responds | The Gateway Pundit
    • Another Bravo Star Complains Of Brandi Glanville’s Face Parasite
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent
    Opinions

    Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseFebruary 13, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    When the boards of regents at Washington State College and the College of Washington unveiled their new presidents earlier this month, it went simply as deliberate by the boards. Each employed new leaders and managed to protect the candidates from any public scrutiny and vetting until after the offers have been performed.

    At each universities, regents who symbolize college and college students — two fairly vital college teams — have been banned from voting, although WSU gave its regents extra leeway within the course of.

    That’s the way in which these public universities need to make choices — behind a veil. But different universities in Washington and nationally permit for at the least some transparency in an important choice regents make.

    Days earlier than the bulletins, The Occasions editorial board supported a bill that may have injected some transparency into the method. House Bill 1337, in its unique type, would require universities to make president candidate finalists out there to the general public in an open discussion board. The assembly would permit questions from the general public, together with college students and school. Such scrutiny is required contemplating incidents at Oregon State University, Wichita State University and elsewhere the place the general public or the information media have uncovered questionable data in newly employed presidents’ backgrounds — data that eluded govt search corporations.

    A proposed substitute invoice beneath dialogue would strip away the open discussion board for finalists requirement, however would permit pupil and school regents to vote on hiring solely when it includes a president. At the moment, state legislation prohibits pupil and school board members from voting on issues associated to hiring, firing or disciplining college members. Although this invoice doesn’t enhance transparency, it does permit for college kids’ views to be offered by way of the poll, and for universities’ students to evaluate a candidate’s scholarship.

    However time is working out for this session. That model of the bipartisan invoice, as soon as formally launched, ought to be granted a listening to and an govt session within the Home’s Postsecondary Training & Workforce Committee earlier than the Feb. 21 deadline. Chair Dave Paul, D-Oak Harbor, has a report of placing college students’ futures first with payments that assist make school attainable. As pupil regents, these school college students deserve a voice and vote, together with the school members who’re instructing them.

    The Seattle Occasions editorial board: members are editorial web page editor Kate Riley, Frank A. Blethen, Melissa Davis, Josh Farley, Alex Fryer, Claudia Rowe, Carlton Winfrey and William Ok. Blethen (emeritus).



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    The Seattle Times editorial board recommends: Vote ‘no’ on democracy vouchers’ renewal

    July 26, 2025

    Understanding the ‘why’ of Idaho case will never be enough

    July 26, 2025

    King County crime survivors deserve an investment in services — and a new county executive who will make it happen

    July 26, 2025

    Seattle’s ‘harm reduction’ approach around drugs perpetuates the harm

    July 25, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    How Can Europe Talk to Trump? Macron Tries Flattery, and Gentle Resistance.

    February 25, 2025

    Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs hit with new sex trafficking charges a month before trial

    April 5, 2025

    EU hopes for Trump tariff deal by July deadline after ‘good exchange’

    July 7, 2025

    Sudanese army accuses Libya’s Haftar of joint border attack with RSF | Khalifa Haftar News

    June 10, 2025

    Russian Strike Kills 18, including 9 Children, Ukraine Says

    April 5, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.