This week Tucker Carlson interviewed Larry Sanger a web mission developer and co-founder of Wikipedia.
Throughout their dialogue, Tucker Carlson burst out laughing as Wikipedia’s Co-Founder Larry Sanger reveals him the web site’s BLACKLIST of banned sources.
“It’s so humorous. That is superb.”
When you see which web sites rely as “dependable” and that are excluded, you’ll be laughing alongside Carlson.
Wikipedia has the checklist posted right here at their reliable sources entry.
BLACKLISTED:
- Breitbart
- Every day Caller
- Epoch Instances
- Fox Information
- New York Put up
- The Federalist
- The Gateway Pundit
Inexperienced Lit:
- New York Instances
- Washington Put up
- CNN
- MSNBC
- The Nation
- Mom Jones
- GLAAD
- TV Information
Vigilant Fox posted the section from Tucker’s interview.
STORY #9 – #9 – Tucker Carlson bursts out laughing as Wikipedia’s Co-Founder Larry Sanger reveals him the web site’s BLACKLIST of banned sources.
“It’s so humorous. That is superb.”
When you see which web sites rely as “dependable” and that are excluded, you’ll be laughing alongside… pic.twitter.com/xzxupVAeoJ
— Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) September 30, 2025
For years now The Gateway Pundit has been reporting on Wikipedia’s leftwing bias.
T. D. Adler at Breitbart News in December 2019 reported the Wikipedia blacklists now embrace The Epoch Instances and The Gateway Pundit for our truthful reporting on Russiagate.
Wikipedia used Gateway Pundit reporting that was true and factual and used it towards us as an excuse to censor The Gateway Pundit.
China critics the Epoch Instances and conservative outlet the Gateway Pundit have been banned from use as dependable sources on Wikipedia within the newest circumstances of stories shops that assist President Trump being banned from the net encyclopedia. The Epoch Instances ban proposal cited NBC’s hit piece on the positioning over its protection of improprieties within the Russia investigation, generally known as Spygate, which prompted smear efforts towards the outlet on Wikipedia. Gateway Pundit was proposed for a ban shortly after Epoch Instances.
The Epoch Instances Wikipedia ban proposal was apparently prompted by considered one of its articles being cited on the Wikipedia web page for Joseph Mifsud, a key controversial determine within the origins of the discredited Russia investigation. Gateway Pundit’s ban was in response to the outlet being cited for previous media silence over Ukrainian interference within the 2016 election.
Over the previous yr, Wikipedia editors have been on a banning spree concentrating on conservative information sources. Having beforehand banned the Every day Mail as a supply, the next yr marked the start of an acceleration of the method. Since then, editors have imposed related bans on fifteen different websites apart from Epoch Instances and Gateway Pundit. Whereas some data-focused websites and state-owned shops in Venezuela and Iran have additionally been banned, the majority of the websites banned have been conservative-leaning information shops. Breitbart Information was blacklisted as a “dependable supply” on Wikipedia in 2018…
…Gateway Pundit’s ban got here from a proposal quickly after the proposed ban for Epoch Instances. The ban proposal got here in response to editor “BullRangifer” removing a 2017 piece criticizing media silence on Ukraine colluding with Democrats to affect the 2016 election. The article was originally added to border Gateway Pundit as “fueling conspiracy theories” associated to the impeachment inquiry over Trump’s name with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In reality, the piece accurately famous Politico’s coverage of DNC contractor Alexandra Chalupa soliciting Ukrainian interference and then-Democratic minority chief of the Home Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff expressing concerns in regards to the reported interference.
Criticism of Gateway Pundit was harsher throughout the ban discussion, although nonetheless predominantly from left-wing editors. Some regarded the outlet as unreliable, however argued towards a full sourcing ban as they believed some reputable makes use of could exist. Along with Simonm223, who additionally voted for the ban, editors advocating a ban included “Snooganssnoogans” and “Volunteer Marek” who every have a historical past of smearing the outlet on Wikipedia.
Editor “Snoogansnoogans” beforehand added a description to Gateway Pundit’s Wikipedia article stating the positioning “is thought for publishing falsehoods and spreading hoaxes.” Marek a yr later labeled the outlet a “faux information web site” and every description persists to today not directly regardless of initially not being based mostly on any sources thought-about “dependable” on Wikipedia. Nevertheless, these labels and descriptions subsequently made their solution to main media shops. These shops had been later cited to again up the fabric on Wikipedia, in an obvious “citogenesis” case, referring to a type of round sourcing.
Wikipedia, a really far left outlet has been censoring, concentrating on and smearing The Gateway Pundit and different distinguished conservative web sites and voices for years.
The Gateway Pundit is without doubt one of the main conservative publishers in America and the world. Our web site averages over 3 million web page views a day. The left hates TGP as a result of we consistently break tales, form narrative, and since we’re extra reliable than any of the key liberal shops.
Visitor contributor T. D. Adler in November defined how Wikipedia works utilizing “citogenesis” or “round reporting” to smear and harm conservative shops like The Gateway Pundit.
* * * * * * * * * * * *
The Hill reported that Home Oversight and Authorities Reform Committee has launched an investigation into far-left Wikipedia.
Chairman James Comer, (R-KY) and Rep. Nancy Mace, (R-SC) chair of the panel’s subcommittee on cybersecurity, data know-how and authorities innovation, despatched an data request in regards to the subject to Maryana Iskander, chief govt officer of the Wikimedia Basis, the nonprofit that hosts Wikipedia on Wednesday.
The letter calls for that CEO Maryana Iskander present data on international operations and people at tutorial establishments backed by U.S. taxpayer {dollars} to affect U.S. public opinion.
The Committees are requesting the next data from Wikipedia of their ongoing investigation.
1. Data, communications, or evaluation pertaining to potential coordination by nation state actors in modifying actions on Wikipedia.
2. Data, communications, or evaluation pertaining to potential coordination inside tutorial establishments or different organized efforts to edit or affect content material recognized as presumably violating Wikipedia insurance policies.
3. Data of Wikipedia’s Arbitration Committee (ArbCom) together with however not restricted to all editor conduct disputes and actions taken towards them.
4. Data displaying figuring out and distinctive traits of accounts (reminiscent of names, IP addresses, registration dates, consumer exercise logs) for editors topic to actions by ArbCom.
5. Documentation of Wikipedia’s editorial insurance policies and protocols together with these geared toward making certain neutrality and addressing bias in addition to insurance policies relating to self-discipline for violations.
6. Any evaluation performed or reviewed by the Wikimedia Basis (or by a third-party performing on its behalf) of patterns of manipulation or bias associated to antisemitism and conflicts with the State of Israel.
Here’s a full copy of the demand letter despatched to Wikipedia on Wednesday.
