Close Menu
    Trending
    • Trump on Iran: Stuck on repeat
    • Starbucks is asking workers to move to Nashville. It’s not going well
    • Ham Radio Brings Teletext Back to Life
    • Marie Osmond Breaks Silence On Brother Alan’s Passing
    • Commentary: Why the US military is stuck using US$1 million missiles against Iran’s US$20,000 drones
    • US Treasury Secretary Bessent says Gulf, Asian allies request swap lines | Banks News
    • Alabama commits to Kalen DeBoer with massive contract extension
    • Earth Day at 56: Happy, hopeful and a little tired
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Latest News»Portugal’s parliament approves far-right party’s bill to ban face veils | Government News
    Latest News

    Portugal’s parliament approves far-right party’s bill to ban face veils | Government News

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseOctober 17, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Portugal’s parliament approves far-right party’s bill to ban face veils | Government News
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    If invoice is signed into legislation, Portugal would be a part of a number of European nations which have already got full or partial bans.

    Printed On 17 Oct 202517 Oct 2025

    Share

    Portugal has authorised a invoice to ban face veils used for “gender or non secular motives” in most public areas that was proposed by the far-right Chega social gathering and targets burqas and niqabs worn by Muslim girls.

    Below the invoice, authorised by parliament on Friday, proposed fines for carrying face veils in public would vary from 200 to 4,000 euros ($234-$4,670). Forcing somebody to put on one could be punishable with jail phrases of as much as three years.

    Really helpful Tales

    listing of three objectsfinish of listing

    Face veils would nonetheless be allowed in aeroplanes, diplomatic premises and locations of worship.

    In line with native media studies, the invoice is now set to be mentioned within the parliamentary committee on Constitutional Affairs, Rights, Freedoms, and Ensures – a physique chargeable for reviewing laws associated to constitutional issues.

    If signed into legislation, it could put Portugal alongside European nations, together with France, Austria, Belgium and the Netherlands, which have already got full or partial bans.

    President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa might nonetheless veto the invoice or ship it to the Constitutional Court docket for checks.

    Throughout Friday’s parliamentary session, Chega chief Andre Ventura was confronted by a number of feminine lawmakers from left-wing events who opposed the invoice, nevertheless it handed with assist from the centre-right coalition.

    “We’re immediately defending feminine members of parliament, your daughters, our daughters, from having to make use of burqas on this nation at some point,” Ventura stated.

    In a publish on X, he wrote: “At this time is a historic day for our democracy and for the safeguarding of our values, our identification and ladies’s rights.”

    Andreia Neto, a lawmaker from the ruling Social Democratic Celebration, stated earlier than the vote: “It is a debate on equality between women and men. No girl must be pressured to veil her face.”

    Two out of the ten events in parliament abstained from the vote – the Individuals-Animals-Nature social gathering, and the Collectively for the Individuals social gathering, in line with native media studies.

    The events have instructed that the proposal incited discrimination.

    Solely a small minority of Muslim girls in Europe cowl their faces, and in Portugal such veils are very uncommon.

    However full-face coverings equivalent to niqabs and burqas have grow to be a polarising difficulty throughout Europe, with some arguing that they symbolise gender discrimination or can characterize a safety risk and must be outlawed.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    US Treasury Secretary Bessent says Gulf, Asian allies request swap lines | Banks News

    April 22, 2026

    Warner Bros and Paramount merger could reshape US media landscape | Media News

    April 22, 2026

    Chelsea sack Rosenior after only three months at Premier League club | Football News

    April 22, 2026

    What is uranium enrichment and how quickly could Iran build a nuclear bomb? | US-Israel war on Iran News

    April 22, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Singer Takes Nasty Fall Attempting Backflip

    April 14, 2025

    This state has no voter registration. How does that work?

    February 25, 2026

    Miley Cyrus Steers Clear of Family Drama Amid Growing Tension

    January 26, 2025

    10 people who will define women’s college basketball this season

    November 2, 2025

    Is Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez’s Wedding Open To Exes?

    June 24, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.