Hello, everybody, and welcome again to Quick Firm’s Plugged In.
Our new print subject options “How YouTube Ate TV,” an oral historical past of the video-sharing web site’s influence on leisure, tradition, and enterprise as instructed by dozens of eyewitnesses previous and current. As we stitched sound bites collectively right into a story, it grew to become clear that our interviews had supplied a humiliation of riches. Certainly, we had too many nice tales and insights to cram into one journal article.
So we expanded the online version of the article into 5 oral histories. Two are stay on our web site now, protecting the corporate’s earliest days and acquisition by Google. Three extra will roll out subsequent week, bringing the story as much as 2025—and, within the case of AI’s sweeping influence on the platform, past.
One of many joys of engaged on this venture with my colleagues and fellow interviewers, María José Gutiérrez Chávez, Yasmin Gagne, Steven Melendez, and David Salazar, was having an excuse to suppose again to what the net was like 20 years in the past. It’s not simply that YouTube was model new and quickly changing into a necessity of on a regular basis life. On the time, the entire proposition of with the ability to simply watch movies on the web in any respect was a novelty. The expertise that made it—and websites like YouTube—doable in any respect was Macromedia’s Flash.
By the point YouTube got here alongside, Flash was greater than a decade outdated. Initially generally known as FutureWave SmartSketch, it morphed from a drawing app for pen-based computer systems right into a browser plug-in that allowed web sites to supply extra movement and interactivity than the early net may muster by itself. Flash jazzed up the web with out requiring a lot in the best way of bandwidth or computing cycles—a crucial advantage again within the days of pokey dial-up connections. A complete universe of Flash-enabled animations and games sprung up.
Flash was so manifestly helpful that Netscape and Microsoft bundled it with their browsers. Finally, the plug-in added assist for video playback, dramatically simplifying a course of that had previously required clunky software program resembling RealPlayer. As an alternative of video being one thing you watched in a separate app with its personal interface, it could possibly be rendered proper inside websites. That’s why YouTube was really easy to make use of. It additionally permitted the fledgling web site to make its movies embeddable on any net web page, spreading them everywhere in the web.
In case you have been on-line again then, chances are you’ll recall all this. However I’m afraid Flash’s fame was tarnished by what occurred effectively after it helped YouTube turn into, effectively, YouTube.
A few months after YouTube was based, Adobe agreed to amass Macromedia. As soon as Flash got here into its portfolio, the software program large aggressively stuffed the plug-in with new options. What had begun as a complement to the plain-vanilla net grew to become a platform unto itself.
As Flash received extra highly effective, it misplaced its authentic spritely nature. More and more, it was a bloated useful resource hog—one thing you reluctantly allowed onto your pc as a result of a large share of the net wouldn’t work with out it. In 2011, I wrote about how Flash had mucked up my MacBook Air, and the way significantly better the laptop computer labored with the plug-in disabled. Did I point out that Flash additionally had some pretty significant security issues?
By the point I banished Flash from my Mac, the PC-centric net that had given us Flash within the first place was receding into historical past. Apple’s introduction of the iPhone in 2007 and iPad in 2010 had put browsers onto new courses of devices with smaller shows and touchscreen interfaces. However Apple didn’t give Adobe the form of technical entry it wanted to put Flash on an iPhone or iPad. On these units, Flash content material confirmed up as empty packing containers.
In 2010, Steve Jobs revealed an open letter, “Thoughts on Flash,” that argued that Adobe’s software program was rife with issues and Apple’s platforms have been higher off with out it. Adobe—and a good share of expertise lovers—noticed Apple’s exclusion of Flash as being about locking out competitors, not enhancing the consumer expertise.
Now, Google’s Android cellular working system may run Flash. And for a time, makers of Android units thought of {that a} main benefit. BlackBerry, the maker of the PlayBook pill, even ran TV commercials trumpeting Flash assist as a defining characteristic.
The one drawback was that cellular Flash was awful. It taxed the units of the interval past their breaking level. Even when it had been extra environment friendly, a lot of the world’s Flash content material merely didn’t work effectively on a tiny touchscreen.
In 2011, Adobe gave up on mobile Flash. Then a set of open net applied sciences generally known as HTML5 largely replicated Flash’s options as a part of net looking’s primary performance, no plug-in required. Many massive websites began abandoning Flash, interval. Adobe determined to wind down the expertise in 2017 and stopped supporting it altogether in 2020. At present’s web is totally Flash-free.
I don’t miss Flash within the sense of pondering we have been higher off when it was central to our computing lives or fantasizing about it coming again. Even within the days when Flash was fairly nice, a single firm bearing a lot accountability for a way web sites labored was by no means excellent. That grew to become painfully clear when Adobe misplaced monitor of the values that had made Flash standard within the first place. When it lastly died, I used to be in a position to reallocate the mind cells I’d devoted to wrestling with it to happier pursuits.
However, it was good to recollect the times when Flash’s influence on the internet was largely optimistic. As a startup, YouTube received a number of issues proper, resembling seeing its customers as a neighborhood, not only a morass of eyeballs. However none of that may have mattered if the web had nonetheless been caught within the RealPlayer period.
As Billy Biggs, a software program engineer who’s been at Google and YouTube since 2006, put it after I spoke with him for our YouTube historical past, “Flash video is what made this all doable.” It was the proper expertise on the proper time. That’s as a lot part of its legacy as its later regrettable evolution and descent into obsolescence.
You’ve been studying Plugged In, Quick Firm’s weekly tech publication from me, international expertise editor Harry McCracken. If a buddy or colleague forwarded this version to you—or in the event you’re studying it on FastCompany.com—you may check out previous issues and sign up to get it yourself each Friday morning. I really like listening to from you: Ping me at hmccracken@fastcompany.com along with your suggestions and concepts for future newsletters. I’m additionally on Bluesky, Mastodon, and Threads, and you may follow Plugged In on Flipboard.
Extra prime tech tales from Quick Firm
This interactive AI-generated podcast app from ex-Googlers blew my mind
Huxe makes podcasts nearly uncannily private—and even enables you to speak to their AI hosts. Read More →
Inside Amazon’s ‘Iliad Flow,’ the deceptive UX at the center of its federal trial
We unpack the FTC’s claims that Amazon used design to trick prospects into shopping for—and preserving—a Prime subscription. Read More →
A Facebook dating app hopes to be the cure for ‘swipe fatigue’
The AI-powered bot may even recommend pickup strains. Read More →
AI tools aren’t making much of a difference for companies
Chat GPT, Copilot, and their rivals are boosting productivity with out transferring the needle on revenue and loss. Read More →
5 time-saving Outlook features you’re probably overlooking
As soon as you realize these gems, you may’t return to not utilizing them. Read More →
I gave ChatGPT $500 of real money to invest in stocks. Its picks surprised me
I instructed ChatGPT with GPT-5’s ‘Considering’ mannequin chosen that I’d give it $500 to speculate nevertheless it noticed match. Read More →
