Pondering of hitching a free experience on the company jet this weekend? Be forewarned – except you’re travelling for work, the Canada Revenue Agency’s view is that you just’ve loved a taxable benefit , both as a shareholder (in the event you personal the corporate) or as an worker.
However how ought to that profit be valued for tax functions? A latest Quebec tax case handled precisely that query. Earlier than delving into the info of the case, let’s assessment the foundations for taxing the usage of a corporately-owned airplane.
In 2018, the CRA revealed its administrative policy , Taxable benefit for the personal use of an aircraft , outlining how the company believes such a taxable profit is to be valued. In accordance with the CRA, a taxpayer who uses an aircraft for private functions that’s owned or leased by the taxpayer’s company or employer is taken into account to have obtained a taxable profit, except the taxpayer pays or reimburses the company or employer an quantity equal to the honest market worth of that profit.
The valuation of the taxable profit is set on the premise of what’s “affordable” based mostly on every scenario. A few years in the past, the Federal Court docket of Attraction discovered that the worth of a shareholder profit for tax functions is the worth a shareholder would have needed to pay for a similar profit in comparable circumstances if they’d not been a shareholder of the corporate. Based mostly on this, the CRA got here up with three situations and valuation strategies for the taxable profit related to corporate air travel .
The primary situation is the place the shareholder or worker takes a flight on a company airplane for purely enterprise functions. Clearly, there can be no taxable profit to the shareholder or worker. If, nevertheless, the shareholder or worker is accompanied by relations or pals on the flight, the CRA’s basic opinion is that their flights can be thought-about private and taxable to the shareholder or worker.
The CRA cites the instance of a senior government travelling to Europe for knowledgeable convention with a partner and youngsters. On this case, the CRA’s view is that the shareholder or worker will usually be thought-about to have obtained a taxable profit equal to the best priced ticket on a commonly scheduled flight (e.g. top quality or enterprise class) for every member of the family or buddy on the flight.
The second situation is one during which a shareholder or worker takes a flight on the airplane the place there isn’t a enterprise goal for the flight. On this case, the worth of the taxable profit is the same as the worth of the constitution of an equal plane for an equal flight. An instance can be the place the CEO takes an employer’s plane to Europe for trip functions.
To worth this profit, the CRA instructs taxpayers to show to the open market constitution worth, which would come with the worth to journey to the vacation spot, the worth to journey again to the originating location, any incremental charges or expenses for the layover interval and extra providers supplied through the flight. The constitution worth would additionally embrace the price of a “lifeless head” flight if the plane is required to be returned to its house location for a time frame earlier than returning to choose up the passengers of the unique flight.
Lastly, the place a company airplane is utilized by its shareholders or workers primarily for private functions relative to the plane’s complete use through the calendar 12 months, the worth of the taxable profit is the same as the private use portion of the plane’s precise working prices plus some kind of imputed “available-for-use” or standby cost. The available-for-use quantity is equal to an imputed lease quantity or fairness fee of return on the unique price of the plane that’s made obtainable to the shareholder or worker through the 12 months.
The latest Quebec tax case concerned a taxpayer who was the director of assorted firms of a company group. In late 2012, the group acquired an $8 million Hawker 4000 plane that was used primarily for enterprise functions. For the 2013 and 2014 taxation years , the taxpayer reported private use of the plane for himself and his associates as 20.78 per cent and 23.46 per cent, respectively, of the whole use.
Whereas each the taxpayer and Revenu Québec acknowledged {that a} taxable profit was obtained for private use of the plane, the difficulty underneath dispute was how that profit needs to be calculated. Revenu Québec assessed the taxpayer to incorporate quantities of $179,786 and $517,829 in revenue for the years 2013 and 2014, respectively, as a profit for the private use of the plane. The company’s calculations had been based mostly on a proportion of complete working prices and capital price allowance (i.e. tax depreciation) claimed by the company, prorated by the variety of private versus complete hours flown in every year.
The taxpayer, however, had solely reimbursed the company group to be used of the jet for $28,532 in 2013, and for $19,722 in 2014. The taxpayer argued that the willpower of honest market worth needs to be the worth of enterprise class tickets for equal flights when the taxpayer was accompanied by a relative on a enterprise journey.
The decide disagreed with the taxpayer’s evaluation, concluding that the one right measure of the honest market worth of the taxable profit is to find out how a lot it could have price to constitution a personal airplane for routes an identical to these flown by the taxpayer and his company.
The taxpayer’s logic of utilizing enterprise class ticket pricing “doesn’t correspond in any option to the profit obtained by (the taxpayer),” the decide mentioned. Citing a report from an plane administration firm, the decide famous that “a personal flight is way sooner, boarding is sort of instantaneous, there aren’t any queues on the airport for boarding, and customs officers usually journey to the non-public terminal to greet passengers, which is by no means similar to a industrial flight. As well as, the (taxpayer) is on board the plane in full privateness together with his company when he travels. Thus, the worth of an air ticket, even in top quality, can’t be used as a comparability in such a context.”
The decide, nevertheless, additionally disagreed with Revenu Québec’s argument that the prices technique, together with capital price allowance, approximates the honest market worth of the profit.
As a substitute, the decide used a fee of US$6,500/hour, which was based mostly on the company’s accounting information, to calculate the taxable profit, based mostly on the private hours of use of the taxpayer and his household and pals. After changing to Canadian {dollars}, and deducting the quantities already reimbursed by the taxpayer to the company for private use, the taxable profit was decided to be $102,191 for 2013 and $263,060 for 2014.
Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com .
In the event you preferred this story, sign up for more within the FP Investor e-newsletter.
