Close Menu
    Trending
    • The ‘Most 200 3-pointer NBA seasons’ quiz
    • Elon Musk Is Currently Living in an Airstream Trailer
    • US Denies Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas Entry Visa Ahead of U.N. General Assembly * The Gateway Pundit * by Margaret Flavin
    • Ed Sheeran Facing More Tour Trouble Amid Macklemore Drama
    • China, US top diplomats discuss ‘high-level interactions’ in call, Beijing says
    • Rare Ethiopian manuscript stolen by British forces triggers restitution row | Arts and Culture News
    • The ‘Active 100-yard, 1-TD catch leaders’ quiz
    • Beacon is betting AI can reinvent Main Street software
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Trending News»From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?
    Trending News

    From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 27, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    CRITICAL BATTLEGROUND: SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS

    Whereas tariff talks proceed to dominate world headlines, specialists say the actual flashpoint is expertise, semiconductor microchips specifically which energy the whole lot from electrical autos to smartphones, computer systems and satellites. 

    The tiny however highly effective chips have lengthy been on the centre of the US-China commerce conflict, fuelled by China’s push for semiconductor self-sufficiency and US efforts to block China’s access to advanced chip-making technology. 

    “The US-China tech conflict will probably intensify as Washington tightens export controls and Beijing accelerates its push for semiconductor self-reliance,” mentioned Jing Qian, co-founder and managing director of the Asia Society Coverage Institute’s Middle for China Evaluation. 

    Already, China has launched what analysts say could be its strongest retaliations towards US restrictions on AI chip exports to China – antitrust efforts which had been additionally used in Beijing’s high-profile probe towards US chipmaker Nvidia.

    On Jan 16, China’s commerce ministry began a probe into US chip exports that may look at whether or not US chip makers had been being given unfair benefits by way of incentives and grants. 

    “Corporations have been exporting associated mature-process chip merchandise to China at low costs, harming the official pursuits of the home trade,” a ministry spokesperson mentioned. “The considerations of China’s home trade are cheap and so they have the suitable to request a commerce treatment investigation.” 
     
    The investigation was a direct and “calculated response” from Beijing to US insurance policies, Jing mentioned, one which “leveraged China’s huge market dimension and manufacturing capability to say itself as a negotiator of equal standing”.

    “These actions are a part of a broader technique to unsettle US companies and affect policymaker choices,” Jing mentioned, warning that in addition they got here with dangers. 

    “Heightened compliance prices, regulatory unpredictability and fears of arbitrary enforcement could deter international funding and hinder technological collaboration, probably undermining China’s long-term aims,” he added. 

    China’s antitrust legal guidelines have “grown stronger” in current months, famous Chen.

    “Antitrust investigations are supposed to uncover and proper anti-competitive behaviors or violations of merger circumstances,” Chen mentioned. 

    “Provided that China has instituted procedures for conducting antitrust investigations, they have to stay grounded in antitrust rules to keep away from undermining transparency and shaking investor confidence.”

    “Escalation solely is sensible for Beijing if forceful responses deter additional adversarial insurance policies or add strain for reversing present US measures,” he mentioned, including: “I don’t imagine China must tighten antitrust laws to (put) international companies at a drawback.” 



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    China, US top diplomats discuss ‘high-level interactions’ in call, Beijing says

    September 17, 2026

    Canada’s Carney pushes ‘new alliance’ with EU despite Trump threats

    September 17, 2026

    Trump derides EU pitch to Canada as ‘laughable’, threatens more tariffs

    September 17, 2026

    CNA Explains: Why is the Fed raising interest rates again – and what does it mean for Asia?

    September 17, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Stock markets plunge as Trump ramps up tensions over Greenland | Donald Trump News

    January 21, 2026

    South Africa AI Policy Leverage as Africa’s Test Case

    May 27, 2026

    Tom Green, Former Provocateur, Is Building Something New

    January 25, 2025

    The anti-boredom tech tool kit for meetings and classes

    March 29, 2026

    The ‘Active playoff scoring leaders’ quiz

    May 11, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.