Close Menu
    Trending
    • Bill Maher Schools Lefty Actor John Leguizamo on Illegal Immigration: ‘Countries Have to Have a Border’ (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • World Aquatics Championships: E. coli bacteria to blame for postponed Sentosa open water race
    • Peru reopens 3,800-year-old Penico archaeological site for visitors | History News
    • MLS summer transfers: Could former top U.S. prospect land in L.A.?
    • This IBM ThinkPad was astounding in 1995—and still is
    • Nvidia says it will restart H20 artificial intelligence chip sales to China
    • UK Data Use And Access Act – Digital Wallets Coming
    • New Poll Finds Trump’s Immigration Policies Still Strongly Supported by the American People | The Gateway Pundit
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent
    Opinions

    Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseFebruary 13, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Grant hearing for bill to make hiring of university presidents transparent
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    When the boards of regents at Washington State College and the College of Washington unveiled their new presidents earlier this month, it went simply as deliberate by the boards. Each employed new leaders and managed to protect the candidates from any public scrutiny and vetting until after the offers have been performed.

    At each universities, regents who symbolize college and college students — two fairly vital college teams — have been banned from voting, although WSU gave its regents extra leeway within the course of.

    That’s the way in which these public universities need to make choices — behind a veil. But different universities in Washington and nationally permit for at the least some transparency in an important choice regents make.

    Days earlier than the bulletins, The Occasions editorial board supported a bill that may have injected some transparency into the method. House Bill 1337, in its unique type, would require universities to make president candidate finalists out there to the general public in an open discussion board. The assembly would permit questions from the general public, together with college students and school. Such scrutiny is required contemplating incidents at Oregon State University, Wichita State University and elsewhere the place the general public or the information media have uncovered questionable data in newly employed presidents’ backgrounds — data that eluded govt search corporations.

    A proposed substitute invoice beneath dialogue would strip away the open discussion board for finalists requirement, however would permit pupil and school regents to vote on hiring solely when it includes a president. At the moment, state legislation prohibits pupil and school board members from voting on issues associated to hiring, firing or disciplining college members. Although this invoice doesn’t enhance transparency, it does permit for college kids’ views to be offered by way of the poll, and for universities’ students to evaluate a candidate’s scholarship.

    However time is working out for this session. That model of the bipartisan invoice, as soon as formally launched, ought to be granted a listening to and an govt session within the Home’s Postsecondary Training & Workforce Committee earlier than the Feb. 21 deadline. Chair Dave Paul, D-Oak Harbor, has a report of placing college students’ futures first with payments that assist make school attainable. As pupil regents, these school college students deserve a voice and vote, together with the school members who’re instructing them.

    The Seattle Occasions editorial board: members are editorial web page editor Kate Riley, Frank A. Blethen, Melissa Davis, Josh Farley, Alex Fryer, Claudia Rowe, Carlton Winfrey and William Ok. Blethen (emeritus).



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    The Times editorial board recommends: Steffanie Fain for King County Council, District 5

    July 15, 2025

    Child welfare: Invest in health care

    July 15, 2025

    Seattle Times editorial board endorsements: Aug. 5, 2025, primary

    July 14, 2025

    Trump’s cabinet of incompetents | The Seattle Times

    July 14, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    European allies seek united Ukraine front as US backing wavers

    February 16, 2025

    Ranking the five most disrespected Chiefs

    February 6, 2025

    US to ban smart cars containing Chinese tech

    January 14, 2025

    Study sheds light on why local news is more trusted, for now

    April 12, 2025

    A newspaper dynasty ends in Spokane, turns to nonprofit

    April 17, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.