COMMENT #1: Marty, they’re beginning to take heed to you. This decision even mentions the Neocons for the primary time.
Sustain the great battle
PH
COMMENT #2: Marty, Fascinating bipartisan Home decision mentioning the neocons and saying no extra. Your message appears to be getting by way of.
Effectively achieved
We will see.
T
REPLY: Finally, we’re beginning to hear the correct phrases. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who’s a libertarian-leaning Republican, got here out to introduce a decision in opposition to U.S. navy intervention overseas, posted on the social media website X on Monday that he would introduce such a decision on Tuesday. He stated:
“This isn’t our warfare. But when it had been, Congress should determine such issues in line with our Structure,” Massie stated. “I’m introducing a bipartisan Struggle Powers Decision tomorrow to ban our involvement. I invite all members of Congress to cosponsor this decision.”
Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) additionally stated that he would co-lead the decision with Massie and that the decision can be privileged, that means that this designation circumvents the management thereby forcing a full Home vote.
“No warfare in Iran. It’s time for each member to go on file. Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American folks?” Khanna stated in a post on X. “I’m proud to co-lead this bipartisan Struggle Powers Decision with Rep. Massie that’s privileged and should obtain a vote.”
Any member who doesn’t help this must be pushed from workplace as a pawn of the military-complex institution that advantages from wars.
