Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their very own.
Discuss a nasty case of mind freeze.
Insurgent Creamery has filed for chapter, lower than a month after a choose ordered it to pay practically $24 million to rival Van Leeuwen Ice Cream for copying its packaging, in response to the New York Times.
The 2 manufacturers each promote pastel-colored pints with script lettering and equally styled taste names: mint chocolate chip, cookies and cream, pistachio. Van Leeuwen sued in 2021, arguing Insurgent’s containers had been confusingly close to its personal. Decide Eric Komitee agreed, ruling that Insurgent’s founders acted in “dangerous religion.” He pointed to 2 crimson flags: a Wegmans purchaser instructed Insurgent’s founder that the pints regarded the identical again in 2018 and a 2024 grievance from a consumer whose husband “bought Insurgent accidentally” whereas searching for Van Leeuwen. “The chance of all these design options converging at random is infinitesimal,” Komitee wrote.
In its bankruptcy submitting, Insurgent stated its roughly $14 million in property couldn’t cowl the judgment. The corporate stated it’s interesting and that its merchandise will stay extensively obtainable.
Van Leeuwen wasn’t sympathetic. “Insurgent had each alternative, throughout 5 years of litigation, to stop utilizing the infringing packaging,” an organization consultant stated, accusing Insurgent of selecting to maintain “making the most of its infringement” as an alternative.
Discuss a nasty case of mind freeze.
Insurgent Creamery has filed for chapter, lower than a month after a choose ordered it to pay practically $24 million to rival Van Leeuwen Ice Cream for copying its packaging, in response to the New York Times.
The 2 manufacturers each promote pastel-colored pints with script lettering and equally styled taste names: mint chocolate chip, cookies and cream, pistachio. Van Leeuwen sued in 2021, arguing Insurgent’s containers had been confusingly close to its personal. Decide Eric Komitee agreed, ruling that Insurgent’s founders acted in “dangerous religion.” He pointed to 2 crimson flags: a Wegmans purchaser instructed Insurgent’s founder that the pints regarded the identical again in 2018 and a 2024 grievance from a consumer whose husband “bought Insurgent accidentally” whereas searching for Van Leeuwen. “The chance of all these design options converging at random is infinitesimal,” Komitee wrote.
In its bankruptcy submitting, Insurgent stated its roughly $14 million in property couldn’t cowl the judgment. The corporate stated it’s interesting and that its merchandise will stay extensively obtainable.
Van Leeuwen wasn’t sympathetic. “Insurgent had each alternative, throughout 5 years of litigation, to stop utilizing the infringing packaging,” an organization consultant stated, accusing Insurgent of selecting to maintain “making the most of its infringement” as an alternative.
