The Plymouth Superior Courtroom on Thursday denied Clancy’s lawyer Kevin Reddington’s movement to seek out Lindsay Clancy not responsible for lack of proof.
Earlier this week, Kevin Reddington argued in courtroom that prosecutors didn’t show Lindsay Clancy killed her youngsters, Cora, Dawson, and Callan.
Lindsay Clancy used train bands to strangle her three youngsters to dying in January 2023 after she despatched her husband out of the home on errands.
Throughout the trial, Kevin Reddington admitted that Lindsay Clancy killed her three youngsters; nevertheless, this week, he informed the courtroom that there is no such thing as a proof that she killed them.
Clancy stays charged with first-degree homicide after a choose declared a mistrial.
One lone holdout juror refused to vote to acquit Clancy.
“The place does she say she did this?” Reddington stated in courtroom this week.
WATCH:
In a standing listening to for Lindsay Clancy’s trial, her protection lawyer, Kevin Reddington, prompt that there is no such thing as a proof that she really killed her youngsters. Throughout her homicide trial, Reddington had argued that Clancy was over-medicated and affected by postpartum… pic.twitter.com/RqswPfLVzH
— CBS Information (@CBSNews) September 29, 2026
Boston 25 reported:
A choose has denied Lindsay Clancy’s movement for a required discovering of not responsible, ruling that prosecutors offered sufficient proof for a jury to conclude past an affordable doubt that Clancy dedicated the killings of her three youngsters and was criminally liable for her actions.
In a call issued Thursday, Plymouth Superior Courtroom Decide William F. Sullivan rejected the protection request to dismiss the three homicide indictments in opposition to the Duxbury mom. The order clears the way in which for prosecutors to maneuver ahead with a retrial after a mistrial was declared final month.
The protection argued that the Commonwealth’s proof was inadequate in two key areas: proving the id of the one that killed the kids and proving Clancy was criminally accountable on the time of the deaths.
Decide Sullivan disagreed.
The ruling notes that prosecutors offered bodily and circumstantial proof displaying Clancy was alone together with her youngsters, Cora, Dawson, and Callan, on Jan. 24, 2023, whereas her husband, Patrick Clancy, left the household’s residence to select up takeout meals and drugs. Surveillance movies corroborated Patrick Clancy’s account of his journey to a Plymouth CVS and restaurant, based on the choice.
NEW: A choose formally denies Lindsay Clancy’s movement for a not responsible verdict.
The choose says there was ample proof for an affordable juror to conclude that Clancy murdered her youngsters. pic.twitter.com/mplUapn6ZS
— Fox Information (@FoxNews) October 1, 2026
Advert block customers: Some web site options might not work appropriately whereas an advert blocker is enabled, as a result of they break scripts and content material this web site relies on. If you cannot see feedback beneath, for instance, please disable your advert blocker.
