Close Menu
    Trending
    • AI is reshaping work. It could also spark an entrepreneurial boom
    • Mom & Pop Shops Closing In Record Numbers – Are Tariffs To Blame?
    • Taylor Swift Reportedly Offered Bride Irresistible Sum To Snag Wedding Date
    • TikTok to comply with ‘upsetting’ Australian under-16 ban
    • Australia hails ‘shared vision’, as defence minister set to visit Japan | Military News
    • Brian Cashman shares huge revelation about Yankees job
    • Exclusive: 20 years in, this OG YouTube channel is opening a new studio
    • Katy Perry And Justin Trudeau’s Public ‘Hard Launch’ Stuns Fans
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’
    Opinions

    Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseOctober 6, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    My take away from the mayor’s race debate:  Neither Harrell or Wilson used the phrase tax, as a substitute saying “progressive income”.   The phrases used embody the time period “ask giant companies to pay…”   when the right wording is “demand to pay”.   Harrell famous nearly all of folks dwelling unhoused in Seattle got here from elsewhere.   Each touted that Seattle must change into a sprawling homeless housing mission, funded by you guessed it “progressive income”.  Wilson claimed with nothing to again it up that she would obtain extraordinary progress in turning Seattle right into a sprawling public housing mission.  Wilson proposed tax-paying for-profit housing house owners ought to have hire will increase capped at 5%, lower than the rise of prices to personal and function rental housing, which aligns with transfering possession to tax dependent non-profits and the “Social Housing Developer”.. No drawback.. Simply maintain elevating the gathering of “Progressive Income”.

    Joe Wall, Seattle

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought of for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Gift-giving: Meaningful alternative | The Seattle Times

    December 5, 2025

    Legislature: ‘How about spending less?’

    December 5, 2025

    MAGA turns on Costco after it sues Trump

    December 4, 2025

    Food deserts: Think outside the box

    December 4, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Drew Barrymore’s Touchy Style Sparks Heated Debate

    February 2, 2025

    Report: Bengals WR duo makes history with new contracts

    March 17, 2025

    Cheryl Burke Reacts To ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Return

    October 25, 2025

    India Vs Pakistan | Armstrong Economics

    April 25, 2025

    LeBron James puts Lakers on notice with comments about defense

    November 28, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.