Close Menu
    Trending
    • A boom of independent bookstores, just when we need them most
    • One Of The Best Benefits Of Wealth: Buying Peace And Quiet
    • How being honest about the process of ‘becoming’ leads to success 
    • Stefon Diggs Asked For Financial Records In Assault Case
    • Iran seizes ships in Strait of Hormuz after Trump halts attacks
    • Chelsea sack Rosenior after only three months at Premier League club | Football News
    • Victor Wembanyama exits Game 2 after a scary fall on his face
    • Here’s what WA needs to do to prevent utility-bill hikes and blackouts
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’
    Opinions

    Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseOctober 6, 2025No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Seattle mayor’s race: Just say ‘tax’
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    My take away from the mayor’s race debate:  Neither Harrell or Wilson used the phrase tax, as a substitute saying “progressive income”.   The phrases used embody the time period “ask giant companies to pay…”   when the right wording is “demand to pay”.   Harrell famous nearly all of folks dwelling unhoused in Seattle got here from elsewhere.   Each touted that Seattle must change into a sprawling homeless housing mission, funded by you guessed it “progressive income”.  Wilson claimed with nothing to again it up that she would obtain extraordinary progress in turning Seattle right into a sprawling public housing mission.  Wilson proposed tax-paying for-profit housing house owners ought to have hire will increase capped at 5%, lower than the rise of prices to personal and function rental housing, which aligns with transfering possession to tax dependent non-profits and the “Social Housing Developer”.. No drawback.. Simply maintain elevating the gathering of “Progressive Income”.

    Joe Wall, Seattle

    Letters editor: If you want to share your ideas about this letter or on different points, submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought of for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    A boom of independent bookstores, just when we need them most

    April 22, 2026

    Here’s what WA needs to do to prevent utility-bill hikes and blackouts

    April 22, 2026

    JD Vance ‘schools’ Pope Leo

    April 21, 2026

    We’re suing over WA’s new income tax. Here’s why

    April 21, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Nearly 20 countries slam Israel’s ‘de facto annexation’ drive in West Bank | Occupied West Bank News

    February 24, 2026

    IEEE’s Role in ABET Accreditation Programs Explained

    December 24, 2025

    The Cost To Remodel A Rundown Two-Bedroom In-Law Unit

    July 25, 2025

    Machado Says She Plans to Return to Venezuela ‘as Soon as Possible’

    January 6, 2026

    The ‘NCAA Men’s Tournament Most Outstanding Player’ quiz

    April 8, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.