What does “transphobia” even imply in 2025?
Is it “transphobic” to insist that there are immutable variations between women and men?
Is it “transphobic” to recommend that these immutable variations can result in dangerous situations when women and men compete in sports activities?
Or is it “transphobic” to easily be a follower of Christ who is aware of that God doesn’t make errors?
In the event you’re flaming leftist, you most likely nodded alongside in settlement to every of these questions.
In the event you’re a traditional, on a regular basis individual — like Jennifer Sey, the founder of girls’s sportswear firm XX-XY Athletics — you’re most likely additionally nodding alongside. However not in settlement.
You’re nodding alongside since you simply don’t care about what the left slings at you anymore.
Sey hammered that time residence whereas chatting with Fox News after she was derided as “transphobic” by a — shock, shock — left-leaning publication.
The San Francisco Chronicle gave “cultural critic” Soleil Ho an open discussion board, and the columnist responded with this drivel masquerading as a headline: “Is that this the following MAGA hat? Transphobic attire is the brand new hotness.”
The article in query was the standard slanted nonsense from Alphabet Mafia activists, with traces like “I can’t assist however have a look at this complete case as a tragic, empty spectacle that demeans us all.”
(Oh, brother. Cry me a river.)
Ho’s foremost problem with Sey: “Jennifer Sey, a longtime San Franciscan and former Levi’s government, has been fairly vocal concerning the Riverside case — and she or he occurs to personal an organization whose sole goal is to pump out anti-trans activewear and fund right-wing influencers.”
The “Riverside” case entails households of younger women suing after a transgender athlete competed towards them.
Sey — a former U.S. gymnast — responded to Ho with a wholesome heaping of reality.
Right here’s what out-of-touch-with-reality “progressives” don’t get. Writing stuff like this sells extra t-shirts.
Cancelling doesn’t work anymore.
Calling me a bigot and trans-phobe holds no energy within the tradition anymore.
Your previous tips don’t work. Nobody cares. pic.twitter.com/5ZlHgyyo7v
— Jennifer Sey (@JenniferSey) January 4, 2025
“Right here’s what out-of-touch-with-reality “progressives” don’t get. Writing stuff like this sells extra t-shirts,” Sey posted to X on Jan. 4.
“Cancelling doesn’t work anymore,” Sey continued. “Calling me a bigot and trans-phobe holds no energy within the tradition anymore.
“Your previous tips don’t work,” she added. “Nobody cares.”
And make no mistake about it, Sey’s conviction is actual.
“I used to be impressed to start out XX-XY Athletics as a result of I seemed round at all the athletic manufacturers on the market claiming to champion feminine athletes and ignoring this problem that’s proper in entrance of us, which is an increasing number of males coming into girls’s sports activities,” Sey instructed Fox. “Not solely ignoring it, however I’d argue, in lots of situations, standing on the wrong side of the issue.”
Sey famous that the Chronicle has lengthy had a difficulty along with her: “The San Francisco Chronicle likes to troll me a bit. They don’t like that I’m so crucial of town and their establishments and their governance. That mentioned, I’ll take it, you understand, if XX-XY athletics is the ‘new hotness,’ that sounds prefer it’s fairly on-trend to me.”
Oh, and as for Sey’s direct handle of Ho’s article?
“The article total is … I don’t have one other phrase for it aside from ‘silly’ and ‘crammed with lies,’” she instructed Fox. “The author makes the assertion that huge numbers of research present that intercourse is a spectrum.”
“That’s simply false. There are not any research. She cites no research. She hyperlinks to no research,” Sey continued. “There isn’t a proof that intercourse is a spectrum. Intercourse is binary.”
“I don’t understand how a newspaper can’t even reality verify. I do know it’s an op-ed, however you understand, fundamental information shouldn’t be violated, I believe, in an precise newspaper.”
And that is the place this author should respectfully — however strongly — disagree with Sey.
The San Francisco is just not “an precise newspaper.” It’s extra of a leftist rag stuffed with socialist indoctrination. In truth, papers just like the Chronicle are a dying breed, and for good motive.
It’s imagined to be a “information” paper, not “leftist propaganda” paper, however it might not matter in the long term.
And that’s as a result of Sey’s response to the Chronicle was the right distillation of how People really feel concerning the institution media and its shadowy tendrils.
To paraphrase King Théoden, “You leftists haven’t any energy right here.”
Good.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
