Close Menu
    Trending
    • How the Fired Fed Governor Lisa Cook Engaged in Blatant Mortgage Fraud — It’s Far Worse Than You Think | The Gateway Pundit
    • Israel builds up military ahead of Gaza City offensive
    • Why is France’s government on the brink of collapse, again? | Debt News
    • Naomi Osaka’s return to relevancy didn’t happen overnight
    • The ‘New York Times’ is so, so stupid for killing its kids section
    • America’s Corn Belt Dilemma | Armstrong Economics
    • MSNBC Host Does Absolutely DEMENTED Monologue About How Democrats Need to ‘Start’ Fighting Dirty (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit
    • Gold rushes to record high above US$3,500 on US rate cut expectations
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Latest News»Trump didn’t start the war on the poor – but he’s taking it to new extremes | Donald Trump
    Latest News

    Trump didn’t start the war on the poor – but he’s taking it to new extremes | Donald Trump

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJuly 10, 2025No Comments7 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Trump didn’t start the war on the poor – but he’s taking it to new extremes | Donald Trump
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    “A funds is an ethical doc,” as quite a few human rights activists have mentioned over the a long time. If that’s true, then the so‑known as “One Large, Stunning Invoice” represents a grotesque instance of the immorality of US management in 2025.

    It’s a funds that slashes Medicare and Medicaid by $930bn over the subsequent decade and will depart as many as 17 million with out healthcare insurance coverage. The cuts to the Supplemental Vitamin Help Program (SNAP) – a meals support scheme for Individuals dwelling in deep poverty – will render about 1 million weak folks ineligible for the essential human proper of not ravenous. The US social welfare system – one which President Franklin D Roosevelt and Congress launched with the Social Safety Act of 1935 and President Lyndon B Johnson prolonged with Medicare and Medicaid in 1965 – is on its technique to an emergency room.

    This is likely one of the steepest rollbacks of social welfare programmes within the US since their inception in 1935. Many will attribute it to Project 2025. However the disdain for social welfare within the US has all the time been current – as a result of the US can’t be the US with out hundreds of thousands of Individuals who should work on a budget, so {that a} choose few can hoard wealth and energy, and mega-corporations can hoard assets.

    That the US has had a mediocre and begrudging social welfare system for the previous 90 years is nothing wanting a miracle. Whereas a lot of the Western world and different main empires both established or modernised their social welfare methods within the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the US persevered with restricted authorities intervention for residents. Solely radicals throughout the US labour motion sometimes advocated a nationwide social welfare coverage. Till the Nice Melancholy of the Thirties, solely particular person states – not the federal authorities – offered restricted financial reduction to unemployed folks or their households.

    US Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins performed a vital function in persuading Roosevelt to pursue what would turn out to be the Social Safety Act of 1935. As soon as enacted, this offered the aged, the unemployed, disabled employees, and single moms with federal help for the primary time. However each of the invoice’s champions have been conscious that there can be opposition to the federal authorities assuming duty for offering advantages to Individuals, even with unemployment at 25 %.

    Main enterprise tycoons resembling Ford Motor Firm founder Henry Ford expressed their disdain for federal social welfare. “No authorities can assure safety. It could possibly solely tax manufacturing, distribution, and repair and steadily crush the poor to pay taxes,” Ford mentioned. Alf Landon, a millionaire oilman who served as Republican governor of Kansas and ran in opposition to Roosevelt in 1936, additionally opposed the Social Safety Act, on the grounds that the tax burden would additional impoverish employees. “I’m not exaggerating the folly of this laws. The saving it forces on our employees is a merciless hoax,” Landon said in a 1936 speech, additionally fearing that the federal authorities would ultimately dip into Social Safety funds to pay for different tasks.

    Even when Congress enacted the Social Safety Act in August 1935, the compromises made served to racialise, feminise, and additional restrict social welfare provision. The invoice excluded agricultural employees like sharecroppers (two‑thirds white and one‑third African American, who have been overrepresented on this work), home employees (by which Black ladies have been overrepresented), nonprofit and authorities employees, and a few waiters and waitresses from welfare advantages. It took amendments within the Nineteen Fifties to rectify among the racial, gender, and sophistication discrimination embedded within the authentic laws.

    Johnson’s Warfare on Poverty in 1964-65 prompted resistance and helped catalyse a brand new conservative motion. Johnson sought so as to add Medicare and Medicaid to the Social Safety regime, present meals help by way of programmes resembling Girls, Infants, and Youngsters (WIC) and SNAP (initially Meals Stamps), and develop Help to Households with Dependent Youngsters (AFDC). Republican and future US President George HW Bush ran unsuccessfully for Senate in Texas in 1964 in opposition to a professional‑Medicare Democrat, calling Johnson’s plan “socialised medication” – a Chilly Warfare‑period slur equating it with communism. Racial segregationist Strom Thurmond remarked of social welfare programmes, typically – and Johnson’s Medicare and Medicaid plans, particularly – “You had [the poor] again within the days of Jesus Christ, you’ve got some now, and you’ll have some sooner or later,” a pitiful excuse for refusing to scale back poverty or lengthen federal help.

    Your entire conservative pushback in opposition to what Republicans termed “entitlements” grew from the growth of the welfare state underneath Johnson. A lot in order that when Ronald Reagan turned president in 1981, “his administration slashed Medicaid expenditures by greater than 18 % and lower the general Division of Well being and Human Companies funds by 25 %”. These and different austerity measures within the Nineteen Eighties resulted in a single million fewer youngsters eligible free of charge or lowered‑value faculty lunches, 600,000 fewer folks on Medicaid, and a million fewer accessing SNAP – in response to one study.

    I can communicate to the impact of such cuts instantly. As a teenage recipient of AFDC and SNAP in the course of the Reagan years – the second eldest of six youngsters (4 underneath the age of 5 in 1984) within the New York Metropolis space – I can say that the $16,000 in annual state and federal help between 1983 and 1987 felt like a merciless joke. It barely lined housing, supplied minimal healthcare by way of underfunded public clinics, and nonetheless left us with out meals for per week each month. If that is what they name “entitlements”, then I used to be clearly entitled to virtually nothing.

    Previously 30 years, leaders who opposed the federal social welfare equipment have celebrated their victories with disturbing heartlessness. Senate Majority Chief Bob Dole declared gleefully in 1995 that he “was there, preventing the struggle, voting in opposition to Medicare… as a result of we knew it wouldn’t work in 1965”. Throughout his 2008 presidential marketing campaign, the late Republican senator John McCain proposed $1.3 trillion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, together with an enormous “overhaul” of Social Safety to steadiness the federal funds. Fiscal conservative Grover Norquist infamously mentioned he wished to “get it [social‑welfare programmes] all the way down to the dimensions the place we will drown it within the bathtub”. US Speaker Mike Johnson claimed final week that Trump’s funds would usher in “a brand new golden age”. Price range priorities that in the end hurt these in poverty, limit entry to healthcare, and drive folks to work for meals support or medical care are nothing wanting monstrous.

    Ninety years – and 44 years of tax breaks later – the greed and callousness of conservatives and the far proper have precipitated yet one more spherical of tax cuts favouring the uber rich and mega-corporations. It is just a matter of time earlier than these whose grandparents as soon as benefitted from Social Safety and New Deal‑period welfare will search to intestine what stays of America’s Swiss‑cheese security internet.

    The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Why is France’s government on the brink of collapse, again? | Debt News

    September 2, 2025

    ‘It’s all theatre’: How are Europe and the US pulling apart on Ukraine? | Russia-Ukraine war News

    September 2, 2025

    Why Pakistan is rushing to mend fences with Bangladesh | Politics News

    September 2, 2025

    North Korea’s Kim Jong Un crossed into China via train, state media say | Military News

    September 2, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Trump’s Return Has Unnerved World Leaders. But Not India.

    January 19, 2025

    Texas is headed for a drought—but lawmakers won’t do the one thing necessary to save its water supply

    June 1, 2025

    Data Centers on the Moon: Genius or Foolhardy?

    February 25, 2025

    Winning in an era of unpredictability

    March 18, 2025

    Projecting the most explosive NFL offenses in 2025, from first to worst

    July 21, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.