President Trump’s former impeachment legal professional David Schoen dropped a authorized nuke on the legacy of Barack Obama — declaring that the forty fourth President of america can nonetheless be impeached, and in that case, might lose his post-presidential immunity and face indictment for legal conduct tied to the Russia Collusion hoax.
This explosive revelation got here simply days after President Trump remarked that Obama owed him “massive” for the latest Supreme Court docket determination affirming presidential immunity for official acts dedicated whereas in workplace.
However Schoen isn’t letting Obama off the hook.
Let’s not overlook — throughout their second failed impeachment try towards Trump, Democrats moved the goalposts, claiming impeachment might apply even after a president leaves workplace.
They did this in a determined bid to disqualify Trump from working once more — a tactic that might now come again to hang-out their golden boy, Barack Obama.
“President Trump is correct when he stated the immunity determination would assist President Obama,” Schoen stated on Newsmax. “However you recognize what it doesn’t assist him with? Impeachment.”
Schoen pointed on to Article I, Part 3, Clause 7 of the Structure — the very clause that Democrats used throughout their second sham impeachment of President Trump to argue {that a} former president might nonetheless be tried and barred from holding workplace once more. In doing so, they opened the door for a similar customary to use to Obama.
“In keeping with the Democratic Occasion and the Home managers within the second impeachment trial, a former President, as soon as out of workplace, remains to be topic to impeachment,” Schoen defined.
“In different phrases, they’ve argued Lincoln may very well be impeached, George Washington impeached. Actually, as I predicted on the time, this is able to come again — they’d rue the day — as a result of President Obama may very well be impeached if this proof actually says what it says. And that might additionally strip off the immunity, as a result of beneath Article I, Part 3, Clause 7 of the Structure, the Democrats argued it bars one from holding additional workplace. The language itself says you’re nonetheless topic to legal prosecution or indictment. We’ll see how that performs out.”
WATCH:
NEW: Trump’s Former Impeachment Lawyer David Schoen says Obama might get *IMPEACHED* over Russiagate — stripping his immunity beneath SCOTUS ruling
“President Trump is correct when he stated the immunity determination would assist President Obama. However you recognize what it doesn’t assist him… pic.twitter.com/HRlM3kOzq0
— Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) July 27, 2025
Constitutional watchdog and founding father of the Article III Venture Mike Davis lately advised Benny Johnson in a separate interview that Obama has zero legal protection from prosecution for any legal conduct after leaving workplace.
Mike Davis defined that presidential immunity solely protects actions taken whereas somebody is actively serving as President.
As soon as they’re now not in workplace, they lose that safety. So, if a former president is concerned in a legal cover-up after leaving workplace, they are often held legally accountable—immunity now not applies.
This comes on the heels of newly declassified paperwork launched by Director of Nationwide Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, which allegedly present Barack Obama personally orchestrated the Russia Collusion Hoax.
