Close Menu
    Trending
    • 5 ways AI could save our democracy
    • The Magnetophon and the Birth of the Laugh Track
    • BLM Rioters in Wisconsin Threaten to Kill Journalists Nick Sortor and Karlyn Borysenko While Preventing Them from Leaving Area and Attacking Car with VOMIT (VIDEOS)
    • Charissa Thompson Left Taylor Swift’s Wedding Covered In Blood
    • Saudi Crown Prince MBS urges Trump to ‘prioritise dialogue’ in US-Iran war | US-Israel war on Iran News
    • Report details how Dodgers landed Tarik Skubal in blockbuster trade
    • Do this for 5 to 10 minutes a day to improve your brain at any age, new research shows
    • Shock Poll Has Republican Steve Hilton Leading Governor’s Race in Important California County * The Gateway Pundit * by Cassandra MacDonald
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Opinions»U.S. Supreme Court lets Jim Crow take flight again
    Opinions

    U.S. Supreme Court lets Jim Crow take flight again

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 2, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    U.S. Supreme Court lets Jim Crow take flight again
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The 1965 Voting Rights Act was the crowning achievement of the Civil Rights Motion. It stripped away the Jim Crow-era legal guidelines within the South that had, for 9 a long time, practically eradicated any likelihood for Black People to solid a vote or maintain elective workplace.

    Now, the conservative majority on the United States Supreme Court has sided with Jim Crow by gutting the Voting Rights Act.

    Actually, it may be argued that circumstances within the Southern states have radically modified since 1965. Discrimination by race is way extra uncommon. But, in politics, the extra issues have modified, the extra they’ve stayed the identical.

    The South has traditionally been a one-party area. After the Civil Conflict, in response to Republican Abraham Lincoln’s elimination of slavery, it was segregationist Democrats who dominated within the states of the defeated Confederacy. Then, the civil rights victories of the Nineteen Sixties provoked a swing away from the more and more liberal Democratic Social gathering and, in consequence, the dominant Southern social gathering turned the GOP.

    Regardless of the period or the social gathering model, nonetheless, it has at all times been the identical political class clinging to energy — white conservatives. The Voting Rights Act diminished that energy by imposing congressional district maps that extra pretty represented voters of all races, however the Supreme Courtroom has now given all the facility again to the conservative white institution by ruling that redistricting plans that purposely create Black majority districts are an unconstitutional violation of the 14th Modification’s equal safety clause.

    The court docket majority’s argument is that race can’t be the driving think about figuring out the composition of a congressional district. The fallacy in that reasoning is that the justices, in different rulings, have stated they don’t have any authority to intervene with state legislatures that gerrymander to provide a bonus to at least one social gathering or the opposite.

    So, now, due to the court docket, Republican-controlled legislatures, notably within the Southern states, will gerrymander away districts the place African People — who closely favor Democrats — have had illustration. Not directly however successfully, they’ll disenfranchise folks based mostly on race, however in a fashion permitted by the Supreme Courtroom.

    Jim Crow rises once more.

    See extra of David Horsey’s cartoons at: st.news/davidhorsey

    View different syndicated cartoonists at: st.news/cartoons

    Editor’s word: Seattle Instances Opinion now not appends remark threads on David Horsey’s cartoons. Too many feedback violated our community policies and reviewing the handfuls that have been flagged as inappropriate required an excessive amount of of our restricted employees time. You possibly can remark by way of a Letter to the Editor. Please e mail us at letters@seattletimes.com and embrace your full title, tackle and phone quantity for verification solely. Letters are restricted to 200 phrases.

    David Horsey: is a two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist for The Seattle Instances. His newest guide is “Unhinged USA.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    FDA methods of approving healthcare devices need to catch up with AI

    July 15, 2026

    When a young Black man dies mysteriously in the South, assume nothing

    July 15, 2026

    Seattle Times endorsements, WA primary 2026: State Senate, 43rd Legislative District

    July 15, 2026

    New BPA leader must find balance between modernization, conservation

    July 14, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    All-Star’s injury may force Heat into much-needed reset

    September 20, 2025

    Texas pulls off second-half comeback vs. No. 13 Texas A&M

    January 25, 2025

    WA Legislature left a vital task undone: funding public defenders

    March 31, 2026

    Trump cancels strikes against Iran planned for Thursday

    June 11, 2026

    What’s Best, According to the Italian Mathematician Alessio Figalli

    February 14, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.