Close Menu
    Trending
    • CRA denies taxpayer's request for relief from penalties and interest after failing to report all her income
    • 5 Big Franchises in the USA You Should Know
    • War Is Now Appearing In Inflation Data
    • Jesse Solomon Left Shaken By ‘Summer House’ Reunion Drama
    • Trump says will hit Iran ‘very hard’ Thursday night
    • Embattled Palestinian president of Oxford Union: ‘I’m not resigning’ | Israel-Palestine conflict News
    • Winners, losers from Game 4: Knicks pull off miracle comeback
    • Anthropic’s new AI model is powerful, dazzling—and about to get really expensive
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Trending News»From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?
    Trending News

    From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseJanuary 27, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    From 60% to 10%: Is Trump’s China tariff proposal a softened stance or tactical move?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    CRITICAL BATTLEGROUND: SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS

    Whereas tariff talks proceed to dominate world headlines, specialists say the actual flashpoint is expertise, semiconductor microchips specifically which energy the whole lot from electrical autos to smartphones, computer systems and satellites. 

    The tiny however highly effective chips have lengthy been on the centre of the US-China commerce conflict, fuelled by China’s push for semiconductor self-sufficiency and US efforts to block China’s access to advanced chip-making technology. 

    “The US-China tech conflict will probably intensify as Washington tightens export controls and Beijing accelerates its push for semiconductor self-reliance,” mentioned Jing Qian, co-founder and managing director of the Asia Society Coverage Institute’s Middle for China Evaluation. 

    Already, China has launched what analysts say could be its strongest retaliations towards US restrictions on AI chip exports to China – antitrust efforts which had been additionally used in Beijing’s high-profile probe towards US chipmaker Nvidia.

    On Jan 16, China’s commerce ministry began a probe into US chip exports that may look at whether or not US chip makers had been being given unfair benefits by way of incentives and grants. 

    “Corporations have been exporting associated mature-process chip merchandise to China at low costs, harming the official pursuits of the home trade,” a ministry spokesperson mentioned. “The considerations of China’s home trade are cheap and so they have the suitable to request a commerce treatment investigation.” 
     
    The investigation was a direct and “calculated response” from Beijing to US insurance policies, Jing mentioned, one which “leveraged China’s huge market dimension and manufacturing capability to say itself as a negotiator of equal standing”.

    “These actions are a part of a broader technique to unsettle US companies and affect policymaker choices,” Jing mentioned, warning that in addition they got here with dangers. 

    “Heightened compliance prices, regulatory unpredictability and fears of arbitrary enforcement could deter international funding and hinder technological collaboration, probably undermining China’s long-term aims,” he added. 

    China’s antitrust legal guidelines have “grown stronger” in current months, famous Chen.

    “Antitrust investigations are supposed to uncover and proper anti-competitive behaviors or violations of merger circumstances,” Chen mentioned. 

    “Provided that China has instituted procedures for conducting antitrust investigations, they have to stay grounded in antitrust rules to keep away from undermining transparency and shaking investor confidence.”

    “Escalation solely is sensible for Beijing if forceful responses deter additional adversarial insurance policies or add strain for reversing present US measures,” he mentioned, including: “I don’t imagine China must tighten antitrust laws to (put) international companies at a drawback.” 



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Trump says will hit Iran ‘very hard’ Thursday night

    June 11, 2026

    Three Indian sailors dead after US hit ship off Oman: Minister

    June 11, 2026

    Number of forcibly displaced people dips to 118 million: UN

    June 11, 2026

    US, Iran hit each other again as hopes for quick peace deal fade

    June 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Kanye West Reportedly Won’t Let His Wife Get ‘Tattoos Or Piercings’

    November 6, 2025

    Commentary: Apple CEO Tim Cook resigns after 15 years. What’s next for the tech giant?

    April 21, 2026

    The ‘Four starters with 20 points in an NBA playoff game since 2000’ quiz

    May 19, 2025

    Jaxson Dart credits two teammates after winning first start

    September 29, 2025

    JUST IN: President Trump Fires at Least Three “Neocon” National Security Staffers After Laura Loomer Oval Office Meeting – Loomer Responds | The Gateway Pundit

    April 3, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.