Close Menu
    Trending
    • Anthropic’s new AI model is powerful, dazzling—and about to get really expensive
    • U.S. and Iran Exchange Fresh Strikes
    • The Pacific Prize | Armstrong Economics
    • Jacob Elordi Divides Fans After Viral Street Encounter
    • Three Indian sailors dead after US hit ship off Oman: Minister
    • World celebrates, but Gaza watches the World Cup from a distance | Israel-Palestine conflict News
    • 49ers’ Kittle shares new injury recovery update amid Week 1 goal
    • Why being lazy is a superpower
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • World News
    • Tech News
    • Business
    • Sports
    • More
      • World Economy
      • Entertaiment
      • Finance
      • Opinions
      • Trending News
    The Daily FuseThe Daily Fuse
    Home»Business»Trump’s budget bill touts ‘no tax on overtime.’ But he just made it harder for millions to earn overtime in the first place
    Business

    Trump’s budget bill touts ‘no tax on overtime.’ But he just made it harder for millions to earn overtime in the first place

    The Daily FuseBy The Daily FuseMay 24, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Trump’s budget bill touts ‘no tax on overtime.’ But he just made it harder for millions to earn overtime in the first place
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Some of the notable options of President Donald Trump’s “massive lovely invoice” handed by the Home early Thursday is a collection of tax cuts exempting ideas, extra time, and Social Safety from taxes. The White Home said no taxes on extra time and ideas “makes good on two of President Trump’s cornerstone marketing campaign guarantees and advantages hardworking Individuals the place they want it probably the most—their paychecks.” 

    The so-called populist tax measures have garnered headlines and received reward from Republican lawmakers, in addition to unions representing police and firefighters. And lawmakers in 19 states from Massachusetts to Mississippi have proposed their very own “no tax on extra time” payments this 12 months, in accordance with the Economic Policy Institute.

    What has acquired far much less consideration, apart from a authorized weblog or two, is that the Trump administration simply made it tougher for tens of millions of American staff to earn extra time—and truly profit from the tax measure.

    The U.S. Division of Labor has quietly paused its appeals of a ruling by a Texas decide that reversed the Biden administration’s modifications to the extra time rule—which expanded the appropriate to extra time pay for 4.3 million salaried American staff. The rule had elevated the wage threshold for extra time exemption from $35,568 to $43,888 on July 1, 2024, after which to $58,656 on January 1, 2025.

    A spokesperson for the Division of Labor didn’t instantly return requests from Capital & Foremost for remark.

    The rule was spearheaded by Biden administration Secretary of Labor Julie Su, who famous the irony of Trump’s tax proposal on extra time pay, telling Capital & Foremost: “You possibly can’t profit from ‘no taxes on extra time’ when you’re not even paid extra time.” 

    She added: “While you work longer hours, you need to be paid for it. That’s why we expanded extra time pay to 4 million extra Individuals. This administration has walked away from that rule, exhibiting but once more that you could’t have an administration of billionaires and rely on them to struggle for working individuals. Slicing the variety of staff eligible for extra time means much less cash in staff’ pockets.”

    Judy Conti, authorities affairs director of the Nationwide Employment Legislation Venture, referred to as the tax measure a “gimmick,” noting that the Trump administration “is already making it simpler to categorise individuals as impartial contractors, fairly than staff, they usually aren’t entitled to extra time in any respect.” 

    Trump’s allies within the Home, together with Methods and Means Chairman Jason Smith, have claimed that the measure may impression more than 80 million hourly workers. However in actuality, solely 8% of them are estimated to earn extra time pay frequently, in accordance with the Budget Lab at Yale.

    “That Doesn’t Assist Me”

    Amongst these staff is Terri, a cashier at a Greenback Tree retailer in Brooklyn, who was nonplussed when requested about “no tax on extra time.”

    “So what? That doesn’t assist me. I don’t even get extra time, regardless of what number of hours I work.”

    The employees who would profit from the exemption are usually employed in sectors akin to manufacturing, mining, and public security. Some of the vocal supporters of the measure is the Worldwide Affiliation of Hearth Fighters, whose members typically work many hours of extra time a month. 

    “Firefighters already work 53 hours every week earlier than even qualifying for extra time pay. That’s 35% extra hours every week than the typical employee. The proposal to get rid of taxes on extra time would convey significant reduction to firefighters, serving to them hold extra of what they earn whereas working lengthy hours to maintain their communities secure,” Edward Kelly, common president of the Worldwide Affiliation of Hearth Fighters, stated in a statement to NBC News.

    The measure is estimated to price some $866 billion over the subsequent 10 years, per the Finances Lab at Yale. 

    And state measures may have a devastating impression on their budgets, hurting their means to pay for important companies. In Alabama, which turned the primary state to exempt extra time pay from state taxes, the measure price the state $230 million within the first 9 months of 2024, reducing off tens of millions in funding for the state’s Training Belief Fund, in accordance with the Financial Coverage Institute.

    In the long run, exempting extra time from taxes “shouldn’t be an actual pro-worker coverage,” write EPI’s David Cooper and Nina Mast. “As an alternative, it’s a giveaway to companies that will create new inequities within the tax code whereas increasing employer energy and draining public budgets of sources for all of the issues—faculties, infrastructure, security, well being—that staff, their households, and their communities truly have to thrive.”


    This piece was initially revealed by Capital & Main, which reviews from California on financial, political, and social points.




    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    The Daily Fuse
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Anthropic’s new AI model is powerful, dazzling—and about to get really expensive

    June 11, 2026

    Why being lazy is a superpower

    June 11, 2026

    Companies are spending on Pride again—but not like they used to

    June 11, 2026

    Amtrak wants people to work from trains. There’s just one problem

    June 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    5 ways leaders should prioritize mental health

    November 20, 2025

    EU urges US to reconsider UN summit visa denial for Palestinians

    August 30, 2025

    DDG Claims Halle Bailey Won’t Let Him See Halo—’It’s Not Fair’

    March 8, 2025

    Measuring Product Success? You’re Probably Doing It Wrong.

    April 10, 2025

    US, Japanese officials to start trade consultations, Treasury says; Japan said it is sceptical

    May 3, 2025
    Categories
    • Business
    • Entertainment News
    • Finance
    • Latest News
    • Opinions
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • World Economy
    • World News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2024 Thedailyfuse.comAll Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.